Adaptive Haptic Output Based on Device Orientation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices lack the ability to dynamically adjust haptic outputs based on the orientation, position, and operating environment, leading to suboptimal notification salience and user attention.

Innovation Solution

The system and method involve using sensors to determine the orientation, position, and operating environment of an electronic device, allowing it to select and provide tailored haptic outputs, including direction, duration, frequency, and pattern of vibrations, which can be combined with auditory and visual notifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If haptic output is provided without considering device orientation and environment, then the notification can be delivered simply, but the salience and effectiveness of the notification is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification salienceVSAvoidsensor integration and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic output parameters (intensity, pattern, duration) are dynamically adjusted based on real-time sensor data about device orientation, position, and operating environment. The system transitions from static haptic patterns to adaptive patterns that respond to contextual changes, resolving the contradiction between simple delivery and effective salience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses its own built-in sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, environmental sensors) to automatically determine orientation and environment, then self-adjusts haptic output without requiring external input or complex external systems. This self-service approach improves notification effectiveness while avoiding the complexity of additional external sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensor inputs are processed to determine device context, then the haptic output can be optimized for the situation, but the processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic output adaptationVSAvoidsensor processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensing and processing function into distinct modules: orientation sensing (accelerometers, gyroscopes), environmental sensing (light, temperature, proximity), and haptic control. Each module operates independently with defined interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive adaptability across multiple sensor types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A unified processing framework handles multiple sensor inputs (accelerometer, gyroscope, environmental sensors) and application contexts through a single adaptive haptic output mechanism. This universal approach allows the system to adapt to various situations without requiring separate processing paths for each sensor type, managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If haptic output parameters are adjusted based on orientation and environment, then user attention is enhanced, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser attentionVSAvoidsensor and processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously monitoring all sensors and adjusting haptic parameters, the system uses periodic sensing at key moments (notification delivery, orientation change events) to determine when adaptation is necessary. This periodic approach maintains user attention effectiveness while significantly reducing the energy consumption associated with continuous sensor processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Ease of manufacture

If simple haptic vibration is used, then the device structure remains simple, but the notification effectiveness in various orientations is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidnotification effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains a simple haptic actuator structure but achieves enhanced notification effectiveness by dynamically changing output parameters (intensity, frequency, pattern, duration) based on device orientation and environment. This parameter-based adaptation resolves the contradiction between structural simplicity and notification effectiveness, avoiding the need for complex mechanical structures while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11099651B2Providing haptic output based on a determined orientation of an electronic device
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 APPLE INC
  • US11099651B2 patent drawing
  • US11099651B2 patent drawing
  • US11099651B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a system and method for providing haptic output for an electronic device. In certain embodiments, a type of haptic output is provided based on a determined orientation, position, and/or operating environment of the electronic device. Specifically, the electronic device may receive input from one or more sensors associated with electronic device. Once the input from the one or more sensors is received, an orientation, position and/or operating environment of the electronic device is determined. Based on the determined orientation of the electronic device, a type of haptic output is selected and provided.