Adaptive Robotic Head Support for Neck Muscle Rehabilitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing head braces for patients with head drop conditions, such as those resulting from neurological diseases or accidents, are inadequate as they restrict movement, cause muscle atrophy, and do not effectively support strengthening of neck muscles.

Innovation Solution

A head support system with multiple degrees of freedom, attached to the head via straps, connected to an adjustment system controlled by a processor and sensors. This system allows for real-time adjustments to support the head in various positions, promoting muscle strengthening and preventing atrophy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static neck braces are used to keep the head upright, then head support is provided, but head movement is constrained and muscle atrophy occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead support stabilityVSAvoidhead movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static brace into a dynamic system with motors and sensors that can actively adjust head position and provide controlled support. The system moves from a fixed configuration to an adaptive one that can respond to patient needs while allowing movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that detect head position and muscle activity, feeding this information back to the control system. This feedback loop enables the brace to automatically adjust support levels and allow appropriate movement while maintaining stability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If static neck braces are used to support the head, then head position is maintained, but muscle strengthening is prevented and atrophy occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead position maintenanceVSAvoidneck muscle strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic system can transition between providing full support and providing minimal support, allowing muscles to be activated during controlled movements. This dynamic adjustment enables both position maintenance and muscle strengthening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the support parameter dynamically based on detected muscle activity and head position. By adjusting the level of support provided, the system creates conditions for muscle strengthening while maintaining head position stability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of head braces is implemented, then support can be customized, but the adjustment process is complex and requires disengagement of the brace

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport customizationVSAvoidadjustment simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors provide real-time feedback on head position and support requirements, enabling automatic adjustment without manual intervention. The system self-regulates based on detected conditions, eliminating the need for complex manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automatic adjustments based on sensor input and control algorithms, making the brace self-regulating. This eliminates the need for users to manually disengage and reposition components, greatly simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If passive suspension support is used, then head support is provided, but muscle activity is not utilized and atrophy progresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead support provisionVSAvoidmuscle activity maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects muscle activity through sensors and uses this feedback to adjust support levels. When muscle activity is detected, the system reduces support to allow strengthening; when activity is insufficient, it increases support to maintain position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from passive suspension to active, adaptive support that responds to muscle activity. This dynamic adjustment creates an interactive system that both supports the head and promotes muscle strengthening through controlled engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250134743A1Adaptive robotic head support
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 UNIVERSITY OF TULSA
  • US20250134743A1 patent drawing
  • US20250134743A1 patent drawing
  • US20250134743A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems of supporting a patient's head wherein a head support is attached to the head. The head support is connected to an adjustment system, which is configured to move the head support. There is a processor is configured to receive the position signals from sensors, determine adjustments to be made to the head support, and send adjustment signals to the adjustment system so that the head support is adjusted in accordance with the determined adjustments.