Adaptive Recurrent Hopping Dialog System with Dual Context Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional end-to-end memory networks in dialog systems use a fixed number of memory hops, leading to insufficient or excessive reasoning steps for queries of varying complexity, resulting in degraded performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive recurrent hopping and dual context encoding in dialog systems, where a memory network with a memory recurrent neural net layer and a decision meta network determines an adaptive number of memory hops based on the query and readouts from a knowledge base, using a dual context encoder to encode original and canonical contexts for efficient information retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed number of memory hops is used in conventional end-to-end memory networks, then the system structure is simple and easy to implement, but the performance degrades because insufficient or excessive reasoning steps are performed for queries of varying complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adaptive memory hopping where the number of memory hops is dynamically determined based on query complexity rather than being fixed. The system uses a complexity estimator to assess each query and adjusts the reasoning steps accordingly, allowing simple queries to use fewer hops and complex queries to use more hops, thereby optimizing performance across varying query types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of memory hop count based on query characteristics. By introducing a complexity estimator that analyzes query features and dynamically sets the number of memory hops, the system adapts the reasoning depth to match query complexity, resolving the contradiction between fixed structure and variable performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If more memory hops are performed for complex queries, then response accuracy improves, but computational cost and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs only the necessary number of memory hops required for each query based on its complexity assessment. Rather than always performing maximum hops, the adaptive mechanism applies partial action by using fewer hops for simple queries and reserving full reasoning depth only for complex queries that require it, thus reducing overall computational cost while maintaining accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The number of memory hops is changed as a dynamic parameter based on query complexity. The complexity estimator analyzes each query and adjusts the hop count parameter accordingly, allowing the system to optimize the balance between response accuracy and computational cost by matching reasoning depth to actual query requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If more memory hops are performed, then reasoning capability improves for complex queries, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of memory hops based on query complexity rather than using a fixed or maximum value for all queries. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high reasoning capability for complex queries while reducing processing time for simpler queries by using fewer hops, thus resolving the time-capability trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial reasoning action by performing only the necessary number of memory hops for each query. For simple queries, fewer hops suffice and the system uses partial action to avoid unnecessary processing time. For complex queries requiring full reasoning capability, the system increases hops appropriately, optimizing the balance between reasoning capability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11941508B2Dialog system with adaptive recurrent hopping and dual context encoding
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 ADOBE INC
  • US11941508B2 patent drawing
  • US11941508B2 patent drawing
  • US11941508B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes systems and methods for dialog processing and information retrieval. Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a dialog system (e.g., a task-oriented dialog system) with adaptive recurrent hopping and dual context encoding to receive and understand a natural language query from a user, manage dialog based on natural language conversation, and generate natural language responses. For example, a memory network can employ a memory recurrent neural net layer and a decision meta network (e.g., a subnet) to determine an adaptive number of memory hops for obtaining readouts from a knowledge base. Further, in some embodiments, a memory network uses a dual context encoder to encode information from original context and canonical context using parallel encoding layers.