Adaptive Image Analysis with Human-in-the-Loop Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image analysis systems face inaccuracies and require laborious tuning for each application, and human intelligence tasks, while adaptable, can be error-prone and slow, especially when correlating spatial imagery with non-spatial data for commerce and trade purposes.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing human-in-the-loop processing with Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs) and automated image processing, where images are enhanced and analyzed by human workers through a novel task-specific interface, with feedback loops to refine polygon definitions, image quality, and analysis accuracy, correlating results with non-spatial data for predictive purposes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated image analysis systems are used, then processing speed is improved, but accuracy deteriorates and laborious tuning is required for each application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidanalysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where human workers review and correct automated analysis results. The feedback from human corrections is used to retrain and improve the automated analysis models, creating a continuous improvement cycle that maintains high processing speed while improving accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Human workers serve as intermediaries between the automated analysis system and the final output. The automated system provides initial analysis results, which are then refined by human workers who correct errors and handle edge cases, combining the speed of automation with the accuracy of human judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If human workers are used for image analysis, then adaptability to different applications is improved, but processing speed deteriorates and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis workflow is segmented into different stages: automated pre-processing and initial analysis, human review and correction, and post-processing. This segmentation allows human workers to focus only on the portions of the workflow where their judgment is most valuable, rather than processing entire images manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs preliminary analysis and preparation of images before human workers review them. This includes initial object detection, image enhancement, and segmentation, which reduces the complexity of the task human workers need to perform and speeds up the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If human workers are used for image analysis, then adaptability to different applications is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of human involvement based on the complexity of the image and the confidence of the automated analysis. For simple, clear images with high automated confidence, minimal or no human review is needed. For complex or ambiguous images, the system automatically routes them to human workers for detailed review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If automated image analysis is used, then processing efficiency is improved, but accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidanalysis reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where human workers review and correct automated analysis results. The feedback from human corrections is used to retrain and improve the automated analysis models, creating a continuous improvement cycle that maintains high processing efficiency while improving reliability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated analysis system performs self-correction through continuous learning from human feedback. The system automatically retrains its models using corrected data from human workers, enabling it to improve its own reliability without requiring constant manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20130051621A1Adaptive image acquisition and processing with image analysis feedback
Publication Date: 2013.02.28 PLANET LABS PBC
  • US20130051621A1 patent drawing
  • US20130051621A1 patent drawing
  • US20130051621A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are systems, methods, computer programs, and user interfaces for image location, acquisition, analysis, and data correlation that uses human-in-the-loop processing, Human Intelligence Tasks (HIT), and/or or automated image processing. Results obtained using image analysis are correlated to non-spatial information useful for commerce and trade. For example, images of regions of interest of the earth are used to count items (e.g., cars in a store parking lot to predict store revenues), detect events (e.g., unloading of a container ship, or evaluating the completion of a construction project), or quantify items (e.g., the water level in a reservoir, the area of a farming plot).