Adaptive Image Deconvolution for Noise-Resistant Microscopy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing iterative deconvolution methods in fluorescence microscopy often result in artifact-laden images due to the impact of noise, which distorts the image content and degrades quality.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for iterative deconvolution that generates two statistically independent images from the same sample area, determines relations between output estimates, checks deviations, and adapts the deconvolution rule based on a threshold to minimize noise influence, thereby reducing artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If iterative deconvolution methods are used to reconstruct object functions from images, then image resolution and quality are improved, but noise components are amplified and artifacts appear in the processed images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidnoise amplification and artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image processing into multiple iterations, where each iteration refines the object function estimate. The deconvolution process is segmented into successive approximation steps, allowing gradual improvement of image resolution while controlling noise amplification through iterative refinement rather than single-step processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using the reconstructed object function from each iteration to inform and adjust the next iteration's deconvolution process. The algorithm continuously compares the reconstructed image with the original image and adjusts the object function estimate accordingly, creating a feedback loop that improves resolution while monitoring and controlling artifact formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If deconvolution is performed to reverse the convolution process and reconstruct the object function, then frequency components are recovered, but noise components at frequencies with low modulation are amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency component recoveryVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic adjustment of the object function estimate through iterative processing. Instead of a static deconvolution approach, the algorithm dynamically refines the object function across multiple iterations, adapting the reconstruction process to recover frequency components while progressively suppressing noise amplification through successive approximations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs deconvolution to a controlled extent by limiting the number of iterations and using convergence criteria. Rather than attempting complete reversal of the convolution process which would maximize noise amplification, the method applies partial deconvolution that recovers sufficient frequency information while stopping before excessive noise amplification occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250390994A1Method for adaptive deconvolution of images
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 ABBERIOR INSTR GMBH
  • US20250390994A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390994A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to the light microscopic acquisition of image data and the generation of deconvolved images. The deconvolution of an image is controlled by performing deconvolution steps in parallel on two control images, the results of which are compared with each other. Depending on the result of the comparison, the deconvolution rule for the actual image to be deconvolved is adapted. Other aspects relate in particular to the consideration of background and unwanted emissions from the sample during deconvolution.