Adaptive Image Preprocessing Kernel for Hybrid Vision Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional video coding technologies are optimized for human perceptual quality and fail to adapt to the changing environment where images are consumed by both humans and machines, requiring a system that can dynamically optimize between perceptual quality and task execution performance.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid vision system that uses adaptive image preprocessing and reconstruction methods, employing a preprocessing kernel and reconstruction network adjustable by a control parameter to balance human vision and machine vision needs, enabling selective optimization of bitstream and image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If video coding technology is optimized for human perceptual quality, then subjective image quality and objective image quality indexes are improved, but task execution performance for machines deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtask execution performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic optimization by introducing a control parameter that allows the system to adaptively switch between human perceptual quality optimization and machine task execution performance optimization. The preprocessing kernel and reconstruction network are dynamically adjusted based on the control parameter value, enabling the system to respond to different application requirements in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optimization parameter from fixed (either human perceptual quality or machine task performance) to variable through the control parameter. By modifying the control parameter value, the system can shift the optimization focus between perceptual quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and machine vision task performance, resolving the contradiction through parameter variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If images are irreversibly transformed to improve machine task execution performance, then task execution performance is improved, but image reconstruction capability for humans deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution performanceVSAvoidimage reconstruction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing reversible preprocessing operations before encoding. The preprocessing kernel modifies the input image in a controlled manner that preserves reconstruction capability, and the reconstruction network later reverses these transformations. This preliminary reversible transformation enables both machine task execution and human image reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements discarding and recovering by temporarily transforming image characteristics during preprocessing to improve machine task execution, then recovering the original image characteristics through the reconstruction network. The control parameter governs the extent of transformation and recovery, ensuring that machine performance benefits are achieved without permanently sacrificing reconstruction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Adaptability or versatility

If a hybrid vision system supports both human vision and machine vision, then system versatility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem versatilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by designing a single hybrid vision system that performs both human perceptual quality optimization and machine task execution performance optimization. Through the control parameter and adjustable preprocessing/reconstruction components, one system fulfills multiple functions that would otherwise require separate systems, managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If a system dynamically generates bitstream and reconstructed image optimized for task or image quality, then system adaptability is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic generation through the control parameter that governs the preprocessing kernel and reconstruction network configuration. Based on the control parameter value, the system dynamically adjusts the preprocessing intensity and reconstruction strategy, enabling adaptive optimization between task performance and image quality without requiring multiple fixed systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12170785B2Method and apparatus for adaptive image preprocessing and reconstruction
Publication Date: 2024.12.17 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US12170785B2 patent drawing
  • US12170785B2 patent drawing
  • US12170785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method for adaptive image preprocessing and reconstruction. The method includes preprocessing an input image, encoding and decoding the preprocessed image, and reconstructing the encoded and decoded image. Here, preprocessing the input image may be performed using a preprocessing kernel generated based on a control parameter indicating a weight for human vision and machine vision.