Adaptive Impedance Control for Wireless Charging Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic-resonance-based wireless charging systems, such as A4WP, face efficiency challenges due to repeated power conversion stages, resulting in lower efficiency compared to wired charging, especially when optimizing power amplifier efficiency across a range of output currents.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic, output-current-dependent adaptive impedance tuning mechanism in the wireless power transmitter unit, which automatically adjusts the impedance of the transmit coil to match the load reactance, reducing the number of power conversion stages from eight to four and optimizing power transfer efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional fixed adaptive impedance tuning is used, then device complexity is reduced, but power amplifier efficiency deteriorates across varying output current levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower amplifier efficiencyVSAvoidimpedance tuning mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic impedance tuning where the tuning target is adjusted based on the output current level. The system transitions from fixed adaptive impedance tuning to dynamic tuning that adapts to varying operating conditions, thereby maintaining power amplifier efficiency across different output current levels while managing complexity through structured adaptation strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the impedance tuning target parameter dynamically based on output current level. By adjusting the target impedance parameter according to operating conditions, the power amplifier maintains optimal efficiency across varying current levels, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the number of power conversion stages is reduced from eight to four, then energy loss is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower conversion lossVSAvoidpower converter manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates eight separate power conversion stages into four integrated stages by merging functionality. This reduction eliminates redundant conversion processes, reducing energy loss while the integrated design manages manufacturing complexity through consolidation rather than multiplication of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reduced power conversion stages are designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously. Each of the four stages handles multiple conversion tasks, providing multi-functionality that reduces the total stage count and energy loss while managing manufacturing complexity through versatile component design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If adaptive impedance tuning is implemented, then power transfer efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoidtuning mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback-based adaptive impedance tuning where the tuning target is adjusted based on detected output current levels and load conditions. This feedback mechanism maintains optimal power transfer efficiency while managing complexity through intelligent control rather than purely mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The impedance tuning system automatically adjusts itself based on operating conditions without requiring external intervention. The system self-regulates the tuning target according to output current levels, improving power transfer efficiency while managing complexity through autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the efficiency of wireless charging by up to 6% compared to fixed adaptive tuning targets, maintaining efficient power amplification across varying output current levels and phase shifts, thereby improving overall system performance.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetic resonance based wireless charging may employ a magnetic coupling between a transmit (Tx) coil and a receiver (Rx) coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The power amplifier automatically impedance matches its output to the input of the transmit coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance matching: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 3

Magnetic resonance based wireless charging may employ a magnetic coupling between a transmit (Tx) coil and a receiver (Rx) coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10218210B2Adaptive impedance control for wireless charging
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 INTEL CORP
  • US10218210B2 patent drawing
  • US10218210B2 patent drawing
  • US10218210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is described. The apparatus includes a transmission coil and a power amplifier. The power amplifier includes a microcontroller and a memory. The memory includes instructions to determine electric current output of the power amplifier, perform a lookup of load reactance range based on target electric current, detect load impedance, calculate reactance based on the load impedance, determine if reactance is within the load reactance range, and adjust reactance shift compensation to bring the reactance within the load reactance range if the reactance is not within the load reactance range.