Adaptive Earthmoving Implement Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling the movement of earthmoving machine implements, such as dozer blades or buckets, is complex and time-consuming, requiring expert skill, and existing automatic control systems can be unstable due to varying machine speeds and loading conditions, leading to suboptimal final grades and potential resonance issues.

Innovation Solution

A control system comprising a speed sensor, grade control system, implement position sensor, and controller that generates machine control commands based on speed, desired position, and loading conditions, using dynamic proportional, integral, and derivative gains to stabilize movement and achieve precise positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automatic control system is used to position the implement, then operator skill requirement is reduced, but system stability deteriorates under varying machine speeds and loading conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator skill requirementVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts proportional, integral, and derivative gains based on real-time machine speed and loading conditions. The controller modifies control parameters adaptively to maintain stability across varying operating conditions, transforming a static control system into a dynamic one that responds to changing工况.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring implement position, machine speed, and loading conditions. The controller uses this feedback information to adjust control commands and stabilize the implement movement, ensuring reliable operation under varying conditions through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If implement positioning is performed manually by operator, then system complexity is reduced, but positioning precision and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors, controllers, and actuators. This substitution enables precise positioning through electronic control commands while reducing the complexity of manual operation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment by automatically monitoring its own performance through position sensors and loading sensors, then modifying control parameters without external intervention. This self-service capability maintains high positioning precision while reducing the need for complex manual adjustment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If control system uses fixed gains, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying speeds and loading conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol parameter complexityVSAvoidadaptability to varying conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from fixed gains to dynamic gains that automatically adapt to varying machine speeds and loading conditions. The controller modifies proportional, integral, and derivative gains in real-time based on sensor feedback, enabling the system to maintain optimal performance across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (gains) dynamically based on operating conditions. The controller adjusts proportional gain, integral gain, and derivative gain as functions of machine speed and loading, allowing the control system to adapt to varying conditions without requiring complex reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If autonomous grade control system is implemented, then productivity is improved, but resonance issues and grading quality deterioration may occur under varying conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine productivityVSAvoidfinal grade quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from position sensors and loading sensors to continuously monitor and adjust implement positioning. This feedback mechanism enables the controller to compensate for resonance conditions and maintain high grading quality while operating at varying speeds and under different loading conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts damping and stiffness characteristics through adaptive gain modification. By changing control parameters in response to detected resonance conditions and loading variations, the system maintains stable operation and high grading precision across varying productivity conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8965639B2System and method for machine control
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US8965639B2 patent drawing
  • US8965639B2 patent drawing
  • US8965639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes a control system for controlling the movement of an implement associated with a machine. The control system includes a speed sensor, a grade control system, an implement position sensor, and a controller. The speed sensor is configured to generate a speed signal indicative of a machine speed. The grade control system is configured to generate a desired implement position signal indicative of a desired implement position. The implement position sensor is configured to generate an implement position signal indicative of a position of the implement. The controller is configured to generate a machine control command to move the implement as a function of the speed signal, the desired implement position signal, and the implement position signal.