Adaptive Incentive Allocation via User Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online vehicle data systems face inefficiencies in allocating incentives due to their inability to provide real-time, targeted, and accurate incentives, as they rely on outdated data and lack differentiation in pricing strategies, leading to inefficient sales performance and prolonged allocation of incentives.

Innovation Solution

A data system that uses behavioral analytics to map user segments based on observable features, allowing for the provision of targeted incentives tailored to specific user groups, optimizing incentive allocation by analyzing demand models and user behavior for real-time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If incentives are allocated based on annual marketing budgets and historical data, then incentive allocation can be simplified and managed easier, but the accuracy and timeliness of incentive allocation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of incentive allocationVSAvoidaccuracy of incentive allocation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the market into distinct buyer segments (e.g., price-sensitive, feature-sensitive, brand-loyal) and allocates incentives specifically to each segment based on their unique characteristics and responsiveness. This segmentation enables accurate targeting of incentives to the right buyers while maintaining manageable complexity through structured segment definitions and automated allocation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes incentive parameters (amounts, types, conditions) based on real-time market conditions, competitor actions, and segment-specific demand elasticity. This allows the system to maintain accuracy by adjusting incentives according to current market parameters while keeping the overall allocation framework manageable through automated parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If incentives are released on a long time scale (months or years), then planning and budgeting can be done in advance, but the data becomes obsolete and allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of incentive validityVSAvoidtime lag in data freshness
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic incentive allocation that continuously adapts to changing market conditions. The system updates segment characteristics, demand elasticity, and incentive effectiveness metrics in real-time, allowing incentives to remain accurate and effective throughout their validity period rather than becoming obsolete. This dynamic approach maintains data freshness while supporting longer-term incentive programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops that monitor incentive effectiveness, buyer responses, and market conditions. This feedback enables real-time adjustments to incentive parameters and allocation strategies, ensuring that incentives remain timely and effective even over longer duration periods. The feedback mechanism prevents data obsolescence by continuously updating the system with current market information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If undifferentiated incentives are provided to all users, then the system complexity is reduced and operation is easier, but sales performance and incentive efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of incentive distributionVSAvoidsales performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the user base into distinct buyer segments based on observable characteristics, purchasing behavior, and responsiveness to different incentive types. This segmentation enables differentiated incentive strategies for each segment, improving sales performance by matching incentives to buyer preferences while maintaining operational simplicity through automated segment classification and rule-based allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different incentive qualities and types to different buyer segments based on their specific characteristics and needs. For example, price-sensitive buyers receive discount incentives while feature-sensitive buyers receive value-added incentives. This local quality approach optimizes sales performance by tailoring incentives to each segment's preferences while maintaining overall system simplicity through standardized segment definitions and automated assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20170316459A1Data system for adaptive incentive allocation in an online networked environment
Publication Date: 2017.11.02 TRUECAR INC
  • US20170316459A1 patent drawing
  • US20170316459A1 patent drawing
  • US20170316459A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data system can maintain a targeted incentive database mapping product categories to targeted incentive levels and mapping the targeted incentive levels to a plurality of user segments corresponding to observable features of users. The data system can receive a user query from a user computer device, the query comprising product configuration information, apply a set of segment matching rules to match the user to a user segment from the targeted incentive database based on a set of observable features associated with the user, identify a targeted incentive level for a product category from a plurality of targeted incentive levels for the product category according to a mapping between the determined user segment and the identified targeted incentive level in the targeted incentive database and generate a responsive web page to display the identified targeted incentive level at the user computing device.