Concatenated Error-Correction Coding With Adaptive Inner Code Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional error-correction coding methods for optical communications face a trade-off between error correction capability and circuit size, leading to increased circuit size for the inner code, which is not efficiently optimized.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the error correction capability of the inner code based on the error correction capability of the outer code, optimizing the inner coding and decoding processes to reduce circuit size while maintaining effective error correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a LDPC code with high error correction capability is used for the inner code, then the error floor is eliminated, but the circuit size is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidcircuit size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the inner code from a high-capability LDPC code to a convolutional code with adjustable constraints length. By optimizing the constraints length parameter, the system achieves sufficient error correction capability while significantly reducing circuit size compared to high-capability LDPC codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adjustment of the inner code's error correction capability based on the outer code's performance. The system adaptively selects code parameters and decoding iterations to match the actual channel conditions and outer code capability, avoiding over-provisioning of the inner code and thus reducing circuit size while maintaining effective error floor elimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the error correction capability of the inner code is increased, then more error bits can be corrected, but the circuit size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidcircuit size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the outer code's error correction capability is evaluated, and this information is used to adjust the inner code's parameters. This feedback loop ensures the inner code's capability is precisely matched to the system's actual needs, preventing unnecessary circuit complexity while maintaining sufficient error correction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as constraints length and decoding iteration count based on the outer code's capability and channel conditions. This parameter optimization allows the inner code to achieve the minimum necessary error correction capability without excessive circuit size increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8977927B2Error-correction coding method, error-correction decoding method, error-correction coding apparatus, and error-correction decoding apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US8977927B2 patent drawing
  • US8977927B2 patent drawing
  • US8977927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An error-correction coding method that includes outer coding of performing a coding process for an outer code; and inner coding of performing a coding process for an inner code that has an error correction capability adjusted based on an error correction capability of the outer code.