Adaptive User Interface for Sub-Optimal Abilities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computers pose a steep learning curve for individuals with diminished physical or mental capacities, leading to feelings of helplessness and isolation, as existing technologies do not adequately accommodate their sub-optimal abilities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that administers baseline tests to measure users' visual acuity and manual dexterity, adapting the user interface to correspond to their abilities, including locking down interface elements to develop muscle memory and providing a customized environment that compensates for physical and mental limitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standard computer interface is used, then the system is simple and universally applicable, but individuals with sub-optimal abilities experience a steep learning curve and feelings of helplessness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of computer operationVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the user interface based on measured ability metrics. Interface elements such as icon sizes, text fonts, button dimensions, and spacing are automatically adjusted according to the user's visual acuity, manual dexterity, and cognitive processing speed, making the interface equally accessible to users with sub-optimal abilities while maintaining standard interfaces for able-bodied users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple interface parameters simultaneously based on ability assessments. Visual parameters (size, contrast, spacing) are adjusted for visual acuity deficits, temporal parameters (response time, animation speed) are adjusted for processing speed deficits, and spatial parameters (click footprint, drag distance) are adjusted for manual dexterity deficits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If baseline testing and adaptation is implemented, then ease of operation for individuals with sub-optimal abilities is improved, but the system complexity and setup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of computer operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary ability assessments through baseline testing before the user begins actual computer tasks. The testing phase measures visual acuity, manual dexterity, and cognitive processing speed, and automatically configures the adapted interface in advance, so that when users with sub-optimal abilities start using the computer, the interface is already optimized for their needs without requiring ongoing complex adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically administers the baseline tests, processes the results, and configures the adapted interface without requiring manual intervention from technicians or specialists. The adaptation process is self-executing, reducing the complexity burden from manual setup to automated system behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If interface elements are locked down to develop muscle memory, then ease of operation is improved for users with diminished capacities, but user flexibility and adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinterface adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of interface stability to different user groups. For users with sub-optimal abilities, interface elements are locked down to stable positions to facilitate muscle memory development and reduce cognitive load. For able-bodied users or power users, the interface maintains full flexibility and repositionability. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing stability where needed while preserving adaptability where beneficial

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10599451B2Systems and methods for aiding computing users having sub-optimal ability
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 SIMPLEC LLC
  • US10599451B2 patent drawing
  • US10599451B2 patent drawing
  • US10599451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods create a user environment tailored to a user's computer abilities. A series of baseline tests are administered to new users for accumulating user metric data, and a database collects and stores the user metrics. Program logic is responsive to data from the data base, where the program logic is programmed to adapt the user environment to correspond to abilities measured through the baseline tests. The program logic is further programmed to adapt user interface controls to compensate for user dexterity abilities.