Adaptive Interference Mitigation in Wide Band Spectrum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adaptive interference mitigation techniques in wide-band communication systems are inefficient in reducing spectral leakage and require significant hardware resources, particularly in portable devices where memory and processing power are limited.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a filter device that performs adaptive interference mitigation by doubling the input sample size for FFT processing, applying a windowing function, and calculating noise floors using log-scale average magnitude values to identify and reduce interfering signals, thereby reducing spectral leakage and hardware requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional adaptive interference mitigation techniques are used, then interference can be reduced, but spectral leakage is not effectively reduced and hardware resources are significantly consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidhardware resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The received signal block is divided into multiple sub-blocks for processing. Each sub-block is processed independently through FFT, interference identification, and excision operations, then combined to form the final filtered signal. This segmentation allows the system to handle wideband signals with multiple interferers more efficiently, reducing the computational burden on hardware resources while maintaining effective interference mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary portions of the signal spectrum. The excision operation selectively removes only the frequency bins containing interferers rather than processing the entire spectrum uniformly. This approach reduces hardware resource consumption by focusing computational effort only where interference is present, while still achieving effective interference mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Device complexity

If FFT processing is performed on standard input sample sizes, then processing is simpler, but spectral leakage increases and interference mitigation effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidspectral leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The signal processing is segmented into multiple stages: the received block is divided into sub-blocks, each processed through FFT with appropriate windowing. This segmentation approach effectively reduces spectral leakage by ensuring that each FFT operation works with properly windowed segments, while the overall processing remains systematic and manageable through the structured multi-stage approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Windowing functions are applied to each sub-block before FFT processing to pre-condition the signal and minimize spectral leakage effects. This preliminary action ensures that when the FFT is performed, the spectral leakage is already reduced, improving interference mitigation effectiveness without complicating the subsequent processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If larger FFT block sizes are used to reduce spectral leakage, then interference mitigation improves, but memory requirements and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral leakageVSAvoidmemory resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single large FFT block that would consume excessive memory, the patent segments the received signal into smaller sub-blocks. Each sub-block is processed through FFT independently, reducing the memory requirements for each FFT operation. The segmented approach maintains effective spectral leakage reduction while keeping memory usage manageable by processing smaller portions of the signal at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary sub-blocks of the received signal rather than the entire block at once. This selective processing reduces memory requirements while still achieving effective interference mitigation across the full bandwidth by combining the results from multiple sub-block processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3016291B1Method of adaptive interference mitigation in wide band spectrum
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 HARRIS CORP
  • EP3016291B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3016291B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3016291B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter for a radio receiving device doubles a sample size of a digital baseband signal to form an enhanced data set and after widowing performs a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to facilitate calculation of instantaneous magnitude values and average magnitude values for each of a plurality of frequency bins. A noise floor is calculated based on the average magnitude values of a plurality of the frequency bins, and the noise floor is then used to identify frequency bins which contain an interfering signal. If it is determined that a frequency bin contains spectral energy associated with an interfering signal, then the instantaneous magnitude value of the frequency bin is selectively reduced, after which an inverse FFT operation and inverse window operation is performed.