Adaptive Interruption System for Personalized Health Reminders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interruption reminder applications fail to provide personalized reminders that account for a user's environmental and mental states, leading to ineffective reminders and user annoyance, as they do not consider biological, environmental, and mental states, resulting in missed opportunities for proactive health measures.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive interruption system that uses sensors to determine a user's biological, environmental, and mental states, along with historical data, to personalize and time-sensitive reminders, ensuring interruptions are offered when the user is most receptive, thereby enhancing the likelihood of adherence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If interruption reminders are provided based on fixed time intervals, then the system is simple to implement, but the reminders are not personalized and may cause user annoyance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of interruption remindersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts interruption reminders based on real-time sensing of user biological states (heart rate, stress levels), environmental conditions, and mental state. The reminder timing and content adapt automatically to current conditions rather than following fixed schedules, resolving the contradiction between personalization and simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters including reminder timing, interruption type, and delivery method based on sensed conditions. When stress levels are high, the system changes parameters to provide different reminder strategies compared to when stress is low, enabling personalized adaptation without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If interruption reminders are provided without considering user state, then the system is easy to operate, but the likelihood of user adherence is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser adherence to interruptionsVSAvoiduser control over reminder timing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically sensing user biological and environmental conditions to determine optimal reminder timing. Users do not need to manually input their state or configure complex parameters - the system serves itself by gathering data from sensors and autonomously deciding when interruptions are most appropriate, thereby improving adherence while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user biological states, environmental conditions, and response to previous interruptions, using this feedback to refine future reminder timing. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves adherence by learning from past behavior while requiring minimal user input, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If interruption reminders are provided during high-stress periods, then the system attempts to address health needs, but productivity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeliness of health interventionVSAvoidwork output during interruptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of interruption reminders based on detected stress levels and productivity context. During high-stress periods when health needs are urgent, the system adjusts reminder timing and interruption type to balance health intervention with minimal productivity impact, resolving the contradiction between timely health care and work output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9295414B1Adaptive interruptions personalized for a user
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 FUJITSU LTD
  • US9295414B1 patent drawing
  • US9295414B1 patent drawing
  • US9295414B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining an adaptive interruption that is personalized for the user based on conditions of the user includes receiving data describing one or more conditions of a user. The method also includes determining an interruption state for the user based on the one or more conditions of the user and estimating that the user will act based on the interruption state. The method also includes, responsive to estimating that the user will act, determining an adaptive interruption that is personalized for the user based on the one or more conditions of the user.