Adaptive Language Processing for Ambiguity Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Natural language processing systems face challenges in resolving ambiguities due to combinatorial explosion, lack of integration, inefficiency, and high error rates, making them impractical for large-scale deployments and user needs.

Innovation Solution

The Adaptive Language Processing (ALP) method organizes tasks into multiple levels of analysis, allowing for adaptive processing depth based on user needs, integrating outputs for improved accuracy, and using a probabilistic, data-driven approach with confidence measures to quantify error likelihood, thus enhancing scalability and reducing manual effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If exhaustive evaluation of all possible combinations of ambiguities is performed, then accuracy in resolving natural language ambiguities is improved, but computational complexity explodes combinatorially

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ambiguity resolution process into multiple levels (word level, sentential level, discourse level) that can be processed separately and incrementally. This allows the system to resolve ambiguities at different granularities without evaluating all possible combinations simultaneously, thereby reducing computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of processing depth based on user needs and system resources. The multi-level architecture allows the system to adaptively allocate computational resources, processing deeper levels when accuracy is prioritized and shallower levels when efficiency is needed, avoiding unnecessary combinatorial exploration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If rule-based approaches with sufficient rules are used to eliminate wrong interpretations, then accuracy in resolving ambiguities is improved, but engineering effort becomes monumental and never complete

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidengineering effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs machine-learning algorithms that automatically learn from annotated data, eliminating the need for manual rule authoring. The system self-trains on corpora with disambiguated annotations, continuously improving its ability to resolve ambiguities without requiring monumental engineering efforts to create and maintain rule sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static rule-based systems to dynamic data-driven models where parameters (disambiguation decisions) are learned from data rather than hard-coded. This allows the system to adapt to language variations and evolving usage patterns without requiring manual updates to rule sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If data-driven machine-learning approaches are used, then adaptability to language variability is improved, but computational complexity still suffers from combinatorial explosion

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data-driven learning process into multiple levels of analysis, where machine-learning algorithms are applied at each level (word, sentential, discourse) rather than attempting to learn all ambiguities simultaneously. This reduces the combinatorial complexity while maintaining adaptability to language variability at each processing level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If multiple levels of language analysis are integrated, then accuracy in resolving ambiguities is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control over processing depth, allowing the system to integrate multiple levels of analysis when accuracy is prioritized while enabling shallower processing when time is constrained. Users can select the appropriate processing depth based on their specific needs, balancing accuracy and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows partial integration of multiple analysis levels, where the system can process up to the necessary depth without performing all possible levels of analysis. This enables the system to achieve sufficient accuracy for each application without the overhead of complete multi-level processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7475010B2Adaptive and scalable method for resolving natural language ambiguities
Publication Date: 2009.01.06 PRJ HLDG CO LLC
  • US7475010B2 patent drawing
  • US7475010B2 patent drawing
  • US7475010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for resolving ambiguities in natural language by organizing the task into multiple iterations of analysis done in successive levels of depth. The processing is adaptive to the users' need for accuracy and efficiency. At each level of processing the most accurate disambiguation is made based on the available information. As more analysis is done, additional knowledge is incorporated in a systematic manner to improve disambiguation accuracy. Associated with each level of processing is a measure of confidence, used to gauge the confidence of a process in its disambiguation accuracy. An overall confidence measure is also used to reflect the level of the analysis done.