Adaptive Learning Machine for Score Improvement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current education systems fail to provide personalized attention to students, leading to inadequate assessment of individual learning abilities and potential, as they focus on retention rather than actual knowledge and skills, and existing online platforms do not adapt to user interaction effectively, neglecting behavioral and test-taking skills.

Innovation Solution

A self-adaptive learning system that collects data to generate personalized challenges based on a user's Score Quotient (SQ), which incorporates academic, behavioral, and test-taking skills, providing granular and action-oriented feedback to improve scoring abilities through a calibration and feedback mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If teachers provide personalized attention to each student, then individual learning ability assessment improves, but teacher workload and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual learning ability assessmentVSAvoidteacher time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables students to self-assess their learning abilities by interacting with adaptive machine learning models that evaluate their responses to challenges. The automated calibration module continuously updates student profiles without requiring teacher intervention, allowing students to serve their own assessment needs while the system learns from their interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of teacher-student interaction with an automated machine learning system. The adaptive learning machine uses algorithms to assess student abilities, generate personalized challenges, and provide feedback, substituting the need for direct teacher involvement in individualized assessment while maintaining or improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If examination systems focus on retention testing, then assessment standardization improves, but actual knowledge and skill measurement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment efficiencyVSAvoidactual knowledge measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static retention testing to dynamic skill assessment. The adaptive learning machine generates challenges that evolve based on student responses, requiring students to demonstrate actual knowledge application and problem-solving skills rather than simple recall. The calibration module continuously adapts to measure genuine understanding and capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the assessment parameters from retention-based metrics to skill-based metrics. By using machine learning models that analyze patterns in student responses to varied challenges, the system measures actual knowledge application, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities rather than just memory retention, thereby improving measurement precision of true student capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If learning material is directed to average students, then curriculum standardization improves, but bright students cannot reach full potential and weaker students struggle to compete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidpersonalized learning adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the learner population into individual profiles with unique characteristics, abilities, and learning patterns. The calibration module creates distinct student models that capture individual differences, allowing the system to tailor challenges and feedback to each student's specific needs rather than treating all students uniformly, thereby enabling both bright and weaker students to learn at their own pace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The learning system dynamically adapts to each student's evolving abilities through continuous calibration. As students interact with the system and demonstrate improved skills, the machine learning models update their profiles and adjust challenge difficulty accordingly, allowing bright students to advance faster while providing appropriate support to weaker students, making the curriculum versatile and personalized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If online platforms provide static feedback on test questions, then implementation simplicity improves, but student learning improvement and score enhancement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform implementation easeVSAvoidlearning ability improvement measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a sophisticated feedback mechanism where the calibration module analyzes student responses and generates personalized feedback that targets specific areas for improvement. Rather than static correctness indicators, the system provides actionable insights about learning gaps, skill deficiencies, and progress tracking, enabling students to improve their scores through targeted intervention while maintaining implementation feasibility through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10854099B2Adaptive learning machine for score improvement and parts thereof
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 INDIAVIDUAL LEARNING LTD
  • US10854099B2 patent drawing
  • US10854099B2 patent drawing
  • US10854099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a self-learning/adapting system and method that uses novel user-targeted behavioral interventions thereby allowing a user to continually improve her scoring ability by generating challenges and remedial spot recommendations at least based on user's previous attempts and based on a plurality of factors, including but not limited to knowledge or aptitude level of user, attitudinal, behavioral, and test-taking skill, thus allowing the user to continuously improve her score in a limited time frame.