Adaptive Learning Network Using Localized Model Parameter Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing predictive data analysis solutions face inefficiencies and reliability issues in minimizing prediction error, particularly in scaling event prediction systems across multiple devices without compromising data privacy and security.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a global machine learning model initialized across edge computing entities, where local parameters from fine-tuned local models are aggregated to update the global model, allowing continuous distributed learning without sharing local datasets, thus addressing data privacy and security concerns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If local datasets are shared across edge computing entities to improve global model accuracy, then predictive accuracy is improved, but data privacy and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy and security
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential model parameters (weights and biases) from local machine learning models and transmits them to the central server for aggregation, while leaving the actual local datasets retained at each edge computing entity. This extraction approach enables global model improvement without requiring sharing of sensitive raw data, thus resolving the contradiction between predictive accuracy and data privacy/security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary aggregation mechanism that combines local model parameters from multiple edge computing entities to create an updated global model. This intermediary process allows knowledge transfer and model improvement without direct data sharing between entities, maintaining data privacy while achieving collaborative learning benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If data is transferred between edge computing entities and central server to train models, then model training is improved, but computational and storage efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training capabilityVSAvoidcomputational and storage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the compressed model parameters (weights and biases) from local datasets and transmits them to the central server, rather than transferring entire datasets. This parameter extraction dramatically reduces data transfer volume, computational overhead, and storage requirements while maintaining the ability to train and update models effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the representation of local model knowledge from raw data parameters to condensed model parameters (weights and biases). This parameter transformation enables efficient transmission and aggregation while significantly reducing the computational and storage resources required compared to handling complete datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240220847A1Adaptive learning network system using localized learning to minimize prediction error
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 OPTUM INC
  • US20240220847A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220847A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220847A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide methods, apparatus, systems, computing devices, computing entities, and/or the like for i) initializing a global model with an initial probability distribution that predicts the likelihood of a target classification, and ii) continuously learning from local data sets across a plurality of edge computing entities over time by: a) generating local machine learning models based on the global machine learning model at edge computing entities, b) observing datasets via the local machine learning models, c) aggregating learnings from the local machine learning models, d) updating the global machine learning model to reflect the aggregated learnings, and e) cascading the updated model to propagate the aggregated learnings across the edge computing entities.