Adaptive Level Tolerance for Pneumatic Vehicle Suspension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing level control systems for pneumatically sprung vehicles, such as commercial vehicles, experience frequent regulation and increased fuel consumption due to transverse accelerations during cornering, leading to uneven loading conditions and inefficient air spring adjustments.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive level tolerance limits are set based on lateral acceleration, allowing for dynamic adjustment of air bellows' tolerance bands, with different settings for the inside and outside of curves, using sensors like lateral acceleration, yaw rate, or wheel speed to determine the necessary adjustments for air spring pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional level control with fixed narrow tolerances is used, then level precision is improved, but fuel consumption increases due to frequent regulation during cornering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevel precisionVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the level tolerance limits adaptive rather than fixed. The control system dynamically adjusts the permissible deviation from target level based on detected lateral acceleration. During cornering when lateral acceleration exceeds a threshold, the system automatically widens the tolerance bands, reducing unnecessary regulation actions and thereby decreasing fuel consumption while maintaining adequate level control precision under varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of tolerance limits from constant to variable based on lateral acceleration. By detecting lateral acceleration and adjusting the tolerance parameters accordingly, the system allows larger deviations during cornering (reducing regulation frequency and fuel consumption) while maintaining strict tolerances during straight-line driving (ensuring precision). This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between precision and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If level tolerance limits are widened during cornering, then fuel consumption is reduced, but level control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidlevel control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts tolerance limits based on lateral acceleration detection. During cornering, when lateral acceleration exceeds a threshold, the system widens tolerance bands to reduce regulation frequency and fuel consumption. When lateral acceleration is low (straight-line driving), the system maintains narrow tolerance bands for precise level control. This dynamic adaptation ensures that precision is maintained when needed while allowing energy efficiency when cornering occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the tolerance parameters conditionally based on detected lateral acceleration. The control system monitors lateral acceleration and adjusts the tolerance limits parameter: narrow tolerances during low-acceleration conditions for precision, and wide tolerances during high-acceleration cornering for energy efficiency. This conditional parameter change resolves the contradiction by applying the appropriate precision level contextually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If symmetric tolerance bands are used, then control simplicity is maintained, but asymmetrical loading conditions during cornering are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidasymmetrical load adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by implementing different tolerance limits for the inside and outside of curves during cornering. When lateral acceleration exceeds the threshold, the system detects the direction of turn and applies asymmetric tolerance adjustments: one side of the vehicle is allowed to rise while the other is allowed to fall. This asymmetric control optimizes the vehicle's load distribution during cornering, improving adaptability to asymmetrical loading conditions while maintaining reasonable control complexity through automated detection and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes tolerance parameters asymmetrically based on turn direction detected through lateral acceleration. The control algorithm modifies tolerance limits differently for left and right sides of the vehicle depending on which way the vehicle is turning. This parameter differentiation allows the system to adapt to asymmetrical loading conditions during cornering while maintaining control simplicity through automated, rule-based adjustment rather than complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces unnecessary air spring regulation during cornering, optimizing fuel efficiency by allowing for asymmetrical level adjustments that account for the vehicle's inertia and transverse loads, thereby minimizing fuel consumption and maintaining load balance.

Implementation Method 1

A lateral acceleration sensor 2 detects a lateral acceleration ay = d/dt · vy(t) and sends measurement signals S1 to a control device 3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLateral acceleration detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

the level of the pneumatically sprung wheels is measured and adjusted accordingly via the air springs or air bellows on the wheels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 3

there is frequent regulation with high compressed air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed air: Gas Compressor

Data Source

PatentEP1925471B1Method for level adjustment of a pneumatically sprung vehicle
Publication Date: 2010.04.28 ZF CV SYST HANNOVER GMBH
  • EP1925471B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method involves determining standard values of a body of a pneumatically spring mounted vehicle (1). The values are adjusted by controlling air bellows (5) within standard tolerance levels. A transverse acceleration of the vehicle is determined from wheel speed such as difference value of the wheel speeds. The tolerance levels are determined based on the determined transverse acceleration.