Adaptive LiDAR Clustering for Variable Density Point Clouds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional clustering algorithms, such as DBSCAN, face challenges in detecting objects near and far from LiDAR sensors, handling different density levels, and utilizing LiDAR sensor data effectively, limiting their ability to accurately cluster points in 3D space for object detection in autonomous vehicles.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive density-based clustering algorithm that adjusts parameters like minimum point threshold and search radius based on the distance from the LiDAR sensor and accounts for incident angles, allowing for more robust clustering of spatial data points by modifying clustering parameters dynamically to handle varying densities and distances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional DBSCAN clustering algorithm is used, then clusters with arbitrary shapes can be detected without prior knowledge of cluster numbers, but objects at different distances and density levels cannot be effectively clustered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect clusters with arbitrary shapesVSAvoidability to detect objects at different distances and density levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the search radius and minimum points threshold adaptive rather than fixed. The search radius dynamically adjusts based on the distance from the LiDAR sensor, and the minimum points threshold adapts to local point density variations. This allows the clustering algorithm to effectively handle objects at different distances and density levels while maintaining the ability to detect arbitrary-shaped clusters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different clustering parameters (search radius, minimum points threshold) to be applied to different regions of the point cloud based on their local characteristics. Points closer to the sensor use different parameters than points farther away, and regions with varying point densities use locally adapted thresholds, enabling reliable clustering across heterogeneous environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed clustering parameters are used, then the algorithm is simple to implement, but it cannot handle varying point densities and distances effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of algorithm implementationVSAvoidclustering accuracy for objects at varying distances and densities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the search radius and minimum points threshold based on the distance from the LiDAR sensor and local point density. The search radius increases with distance to account for point dispersion, and the minimum points threshold adapts to maintain consistent clustering performance across different density levels, thereby achieving accurate clustering without complex manual tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the clustering parameters dynamic rather than static. The search radius and minimum points threshold automatically adjust based on the spatial position and local density characteristics of points, enabling the algorithm to maintain high clustering accuracy across varying distances and densities while preserving relative implementation simplicity through automated parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If uniform search radius is applied to all points, then the computation is efficient, but objects at different distances from the sensor cannot be clustered accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation efficiencyVSAvoidclustering accuracy for distant and near objects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different search radii to points based on their distance from the LiDAR sensor. Points closer to the sensor use smaller search radii, while points farther away use larger search radii to account for increased point dispersion. This local adaptation maintains clustering accuracy across different distances while managing computational complexity through targeted rather than uniform processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic search radius adjustment where the search radius varies with the distance from the sensor. This dynamic parameter allows the algorithm to maintain appropriate search coverage for objects at different distances, improving measurement precision without requiring uniformly large search radii that would unnecessarily increase computational burden across the entire point cloud.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11808860B2Adaptive search for LiDAR-based clustering
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11808860B2 patent drawing
  • US11808860B2 patent drawing
  • US11808860B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of clustering spatial data includes receiving a point cloud comprised of a plurality of points defined within three-dimensional (3D) space. The method further includes selecting one or more adaptable clustering parameters and traversing each of the plurality of points in the point cloud and selectively adding each of the points to one or more clusters based on the selected clustering parameters associated with each point.