Adaptive LiDAR Object Sampling for Sparse Distant Training Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing LIDAR-based object detection systems face inefficiencies in training models to detect objects at far distances due to the scarcity of dense-at-distance LIDAR captures in training datasets, leading to ineffective object detection in environments with distant objects.

Innovation Solution

The system augments sparse-at-distance LIDAR captures with LIDAR-based representations of objects at far distances to generate dense-at-distance captures, training the object-detection model using these augmented captures, and adjusts model parameters on a per-distance range, per-object, and per-orientation basis to improve detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LIDAR-based object detection systems use standard training datasets, then training is computationally efficient and simple, but detection accuracy for distant objects deteriorates due to scarcity of dense-at-distance LIDAR captures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy for distant objectsVSAvoidavailability of training data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating synthetic LIDAR captures of distant objects before actual detection training. Virtual objects are placed in sparse LIDAR captures at various distances, and synthetic point clouds are generated in advance to augment the training dataset, ensuring sufficient training examples for distant object detection without requiring extensive real-world data collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of distant objects by generating synthetic LIDAR representations. Virtual objects are copied into the training environment at different positions and orientations, and their corresponding point cloud data is synthesized to replicate real LIDAR capture characteristics. These copied objects augment the limited real training data, providing diverse examples for model training without requiring additional physical data collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Quantity of substance

If the system generates augmented LIDAR captures with synthetic objects at far distances, then training data density for distant objects improves, but system complexity increases due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity of training data at far distancesVSAvoidcomplexity of data augmentation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a single code-based generation process to simultaneously create multiple synthetic LIDAR captures with varying parameters. The same synthetic object generation framework produces objects at different distances, orientations, and positions, eliminating the need for separate data collection campaigns for each scenario and reducing overall system complexity despite the comprehensive nature of the augmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by systematically varying parameters such as object distance, orientation, and position through code-based generation. By controlling these parameters programmatically, the system generates diverse training data without requiring complex physical setup changes, allowing efficient exploration of different scenarios through parameter adjustment rather than structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the object-detection model is trained with augmented captures including objects at multiple distances, then detection performance across various distances improves, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performance across distance rangesVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by initially focusing on augmenting specific distance ranges where detection performance is most deficient. Rather than uniformly augmenting all possible scenarios, the system prioritizes generating synthetic captures for distant objects where real data is scarcest, providing targeted improvement without the full computational burden of comprehensive augmentation across all parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the ability of LIDAR-based object detection models to accurately identify objects at various distances by addressing the scarcity of training data, resulting in improved detection performance for distant objects.

Implementation Method 1

calculates distances between the LIDAR system and objects in the environment based on laser light reflected by the objects (e.g., using a time-of-flight (TOF) or indirect time-of-flight technique)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS12354334B2Adaptive region-based object sampling for object detection
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12354334B2 patent drawing
  • US12354334B2 patent drawing
  • US12354334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques are described herein for training an object-detection model. For instance, a method for training an object-detection model is provided. The method may include obtaining a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) capture; obtaining a first LIDAR-based representation of an object as captured from a first distance; obtaining a second LIDAR-based representation of the object as captured from a second distance; augmenting the LIDAR capture using the first LIDAR-based representation of the object and the second LIDAR-based representation of the object to generate an augmented LIDAR capture; and training a machine-learning object-detection model using the augmented LIDAR capture.