Adaptive Lifting Wavelet Transform for Image Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lifting methods for wavelet transforms require a large number of lifting steps, leading to increased approximation errors and inefficient compression performance, especially in lossless image compression, due to rounding errors and lack of adaptability to local image properties.

Innovation Solution

A modified lifting method that reduces the number of lifting steps and introduces a fast adaptive lifting scheme for improved prediction of image edges, allowing for reduced rounding errors and local decorrelation, enabling better compression ratios and flexibility between lossy and lossless compression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of lifting steps is increased to improve transform performance, then the approximation accuracy is improved, but the rounding errors accumulate and compression performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapproximation accuracyVSAvoidcompression performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the lifting steps by introducing adaptive prediction orders and modified update rules. Instead of using a fixed number of lifting steps, the method dynamically adjusts the prediction order based on local image properties, thereby reducing the total number of lifting steps while maintaining or improving compression performance. This resolves the contradiction by optimizing the parameter (number of lifting steps) based on actual image characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptation to local image statistics, making the lifting process non-static. The prediction order and lifting steps are adjusted according to the local properties of the image data, allowing the system to automatically optimize the number of lifting steps for each region. This dynamic approach reduces cumulative rounding errors while maintaining high compression efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional lifting methods are used with fixed prediction orders, then the implementation is simple, but the adaptability to local image properties is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to local image properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed prediction order into a dynamic, adaptive prediction order that changes based on local image properties. The method evaluates local statistics and automatically selects the optimal prediction order for each region, significantly improving adaptability while maintaining reasonable implementation complexity through systematic adaptation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different prediction orders and lifting strategies to different regions of the image based on their local properties. By analyzing local image characteristics (such as smoothness, edge density, and texture), the method assigns appropriate prediction orders to each region, thereby achieving local optimization without requiring complete redesign of the entire processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If a large number of lifting steps are used to achieve integer-to-integer transform, then the transform is more accurate, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransform accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the computational complexity by changing the parameters of the lifting process, specifically the prediction order and the number of lifting steps. By adapting these parameters to local image properties, the method achieves high transform accuracy with fewer computational operations, thereby reducing overall complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial lifting steps only where necessary, rather than uniformly applying the maximum number of lifting steps to the entire image. By identifying regions that require fewer lifting steps (based on local statistics), the method reduces unnecessary computations while maintaining sufficient accuracy, thereby lowering overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7552160B2Integrated lifting wavelet transform
Publication Date: 2009.06.23 AEROSPACE CORP
  • US7552160B2 patent drawing
  • US7552160B2 patent drawing
  • US7552160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The integrated lifting transform provides both the lossy and lossless lifting wavelet transforms while sharing the same lifting chain for either lossy data compression or lossless data compression. The lifting steps can provide a lossless compression and a lossy compression directly from lossless compression while the integer-to-integer adaptive four-stage lifting wavelet transform provides the lossless compression with improved performance.