Adaptive Load Balancing in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless network load balancing systems often prioritize signal strength over cell loading conditions, leading to imbalances and poor performance, particularly in scenarios like 850 MHz and 1900 MHz co-deployment, resulting in suboptimal spectral efficiency and throughput.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive load balancing algorithms, such as Equal Utilization (EqUtil), Maximum Average Throughput (MaxAvgTpt), and Maximum Minimum Throughput (MaxMinTpt), which consider both cell loading conditions and signal quality to optimize cell selection and resource allocation in wireless networks, ensuring balanced load distribution and improved spectral efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cell selection is based purely on signal strength, then connection quality is improved, but load balancing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection qualityVSAvoidload balancing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the selection criteria from purely signal strength to a composite metric that incorporates both signal quality and cell loading conditions. This parameter change enables the system to simultaneously consider connection quality and load distribution, resolving the contradiction between these two objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor cell loading conditions and use this information to dynamically adjust cell selection decisions. By continuously feeding back load status information, the system can balance loads across cells while maintaining quality connections, preventing the imbalance that would occur with signal-strength-only selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If cell state is ignored in cell selection, then selection simplicity is improved, but performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection simplicityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances the cell selection process by incorporating cell state parameters (loading conditions) into the selection criteria. This parameter enrichment transforms the simple signal-strength-based selection into a more sophisticated multi-parameter evaluation, improving spectral efficiency while maintaining operational feasibility through automated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If load balancing considers cell loading conditions, then load distribution is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distributionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback loops to automatically monitor and adjust load distribution based on cell loading conditions. This automated feedback mechanism handles the complexity of multi-parameter optimization without requiring manual intervention, improving load distribution while keeping operational complexity manageable through algorithmic automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The load balancing system operates autonomously by automatically collecting cell state information, evaluating multiple parameters, and making selection decisions without external control. This self-service approach manages system complexity internally while delivering improved load distribution performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10064099B1Method and apparatus for adaptive load balancing in wireless networks
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10064099B1 patent drawing
  • US10064099B1 patent drawing
  • US10064099B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium comprising executable instructions that, when executed by a processing system including a processor, perform operations comprising: identifying a first plurality of cells as a controlled group of cells; determining, for each cell of the controlled group of cells, an average number of allocated physical resource blocks; determining, for each cell of the controlled group of cells, a total number of physical resource blocks available to carry payload traffic; determining, for each cell of the controlled group of cells, a metric equal to: (a) the average number of allocated physical resource blocks of the cell divided by (b) the total number of physical resource blocks of the cell available to carry payload traffic; and performing a load balancing of the controlled group of cells based upon the metric. Other embodiments are disclosed.