Adaptive Locking Differential Control Strategy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking differentials lack flexibility in automatic operation based on vehicle characteristics, requiring manual actuation and lacking adaptive control strategies to optimize locking and unlocking.

Innovation Solution

A control unit that monitors and responds to vehicle parameters such as throttle position, yaw angle, steering angle, and wheel slip to automatically activate or deactivate the locking mechanism of the differential, allowing for adaptive operation in locked or unlocked modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual actuation of a switch is used to control the locking differential, then the operator has direct control over locking and unlocking, but the system lacks adaptability to changing vehicle conditions and requires continuous manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to vehicle conditionsVSAvoidmanual intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically monitors vehicle characteristics (wheel speeds, throttle position, yaw angle, steering angle) and sua sponte activates or inactivates the locking mechanism without requiring manual switch actuation by the operator, allowing the system to serve itself by adapting to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit continuously receives feedback from vehicle sensors monitoring wheel speeds, throttle position, yaw angle, and steering angle, using this feedback to automatically determine when locking or unlocking is appropriate, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to real-time vehicle conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If automatic control based on multiple vehicle parameters is implemented, then adaptability and traction optimization are improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic adaptive controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single control unit performs multiple functions: monitoring wheel speeds, throttle position, yaw angle, and steering angle; processing this information; and controlling the locking mechanism, consolidating what could be multiple separate systems into one multi-functional component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit combines multiple sensor inputs (wheel speed sensors, throttle position sensor, yaw rate sensor, steering angle sensor) and processing logic into a single integrated control system that sua sponte makes locking/unlocking decisions, merging detection and control functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9333965B2Control strategy for operating a locking differential
Publication Date: 2016.05.10 AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING INC
  • US9333965B2 patent drawing
  • US9333965B2 patent drawing
  • US9333965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive train having a locking differential and a control unit for controlling operation of the locking differential. The control unit is responsive to selected vehicle characteristics to sua sponte activate or inactivate a locking mechanism of the locking differential to cause the locking differential to operate in a locked manner or an unlocked manner, respectively. A method for operating a locking differential is also provided. The method includes: utilizing only preselected vehicle criteria indicative of the operational state of the vehicle to identify a situation in which a locking mechanism associated with the locking differential is to be energized; and responsively energizing the locking mechanism.