Adaptive Login State Control via Human Body Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional authentication methods in information processing apparatuses, such as multifunction peripherals, often result in unnecessary re-login operations for users after temporary absences due to errors like paper jams, leading to potential unauthorized access when the user is away.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a human body detection system that maintains the login state as long as the user is present, automatically canceling it when the user is not detected, and providing a simplified re-login process upon error resolution, which includes displaying a re-login screen with reduced operation steps and the option to restart interrupted jobs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic logout is executed when user is away for longer than predetermined period, then security is improved, but user convenience deteriorates due to unnecessary re-login operations after temporary absences

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the logout timing adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically determines whether to execute automatic logout based on the relationship between the actual absence period and a predetermined threshold. When the absence period is shorter than the threshold (even if errors occur), logout is suppressed, preserving user convenience. When the absence period exceeds the threshold, logout is executed to maintain security. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between security and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If login state is maintained during user absence, then user convenience is improved, but security deteriorates due to potential unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing a time threshold parameter that controls the login state maintenance duration. The system monitors the absence period and compares it against the predetermined threshold. As long as the absence period remains below the threshold, the login state is maintained regardless of errors, improving convenience. When the threshold is exceeded, the system changes the state parameter to execute logout, thereby maintaining security. This parameter-based control resolves the contradiction between convenience and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If simplified re-login screen is displayed with reduced operation steps, then ease of operation is improved, but authentication security may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of re-loginVSAvoidauthentication security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-storing the user ID in the control unit before displaying the simplified re-login screen. When the user returns and operates the re-login key, the system already has the user ID ready, eliminating the need for the user to re-enter it. The authentication process then proceeds with the pre-stored ID and only requires verification of the password or other factors. This preliminary preparation of authentication data simplifies the re-login process while maintaining security through proper authentication verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2741486B1Information processing apparatus having user authentication function and authentication method
Publication Date: 2020.10.21 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP2741486B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2741486B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2741486B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The information processing apparatus includes first authentication portion, human body detecting portion, de-authentication portion, and second authentication portion. The first authentication portion shifts the state of the information processing apparatus to a login state in accordance with a predetermined first login operation. The human body detecting portion detects a human body within a predetermined range from the information processing apparatus. The de-authentication portion cancels the login state when a human body is not detected by the human body detecting portion during the login state. The second authentication portion shifts the state of the information processing apparatus to the login state in accordance with a second login operation involving less operation steps than the first login operation after the login state is canceled by the de-authentication portion.