Adaptive Loop Filter for Video Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional adaptive loop filtering in video coding does not account for variations in quantization parameters, leading to suboptimal filtering based on pixel activity alone, which affects the uncertainty and quality of pixel values.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves categorizing pixel blocks based on an activity-related parameter that takes into account the quantization parameter, specifically by dividing the activity by a function of 2*ΔQP^6, to select appropriate filters for encoding and decoding, thereby adjusting filtering strength according to the uncertainty introduced by QP variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional adaptive loop filtering is used based on pixel activity alone, then filtering can be applied to reduce distortion, but filtering strength is not optimally adjusted for blocks with different quantization parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering precisionVSAvoidadaptability to QP variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the filtering strength adaptive to local quantization parameter conditions. Different filtering strengths are applied to different blocks based on their specific QP values, rather than using a uniform filtering approach. This resolves the contradiction by allowing precise filtering adaptation to local QP variations while maintaining overall filtering effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the filtering process adaptive and variable based on QP conditions. The filtering strength dynamically adjusts according to the quantization parameter of each block, transforming a static filtering approach into a dynamic one that responds to varying QP conditions throughout the video sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If strong filtering is applied to blocks with high activity, then distortion can be reduced, but it may over-filter blocks with low uncertainty introduced by QP variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of pixel valuesVSAvoiduncertainty in pixel values
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the activity metric based on QP values. The activity parameter is scaled or adjusted according to the quantization parameter, allowing the filtering decision to account for QP-induced uncertainty. This resolves the contradiction by changing the parameter used for filtering decisions to reflect both activity and QP conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces feedback by using QP information to modulate the filtering process. The QP value feeds back into the activity calculation, creating a closed-loop system where filtering strength is adjusted based on the uncertainty characteristics of each block. This prevents over-filtering of blocks with low QP-induced uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If adaptive quantization is used to optimize bitrate-quality tradeoff, then bitrate efficiency improves, but pixel uncertainty varies across blocks making uniform filtering suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebitrate efficiencyVSAvoidfiltering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining the activity metric and QP information into a unified filtering decision process. Rather than treating activity and QP as separate factors, the patent integrates them into a single adaptive filtering mechanism that considers both aspects simultaneously, simplifying the overall decision process while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10944967B2Encoder and decoder and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10944967B2 patent drawing
  • US10944967B2 patent drawing
  • US10944967B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the disclosure provide methods, apparatus and computer programs for adaptive loop filtering in an encoder and in a decoder. One method, performed in an encoder, comprises: determining filter parameters for a plurality of filters to be used in encoding a frame or slice; determining respective activity values for each of a plurality of blocks in the frame or slice, wherein each block comprises a plurality of pixels; determining respective quantization parameters for each of the plurality of blocks; selecting, for each of the plurality of blocks, a filter from the plurality of determined filters based on the respective activity value and the respective quantization parameter; and applying the filter parameters for the respective selected filters to the plurality of blocks.