Adaptive Machining Control via Tool Position Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adaptive control systems in machine tools are not effective in bevel gear manufacturing processes like bevel gear grinding, as they cannot directly measure and process the varying tool engagement, leading to inefficient process optimization and increased operator expertise requirements.

Innovation Solution

Determining a desired power level as a function of relative tool to workpiece position, using specific power and contact width, to maintain a constant load and enhance adaptive control in grinding processes, such as bevel gear grinding from solid, by expressing set point power in terms of roll or plunge position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If adaptive control systems use bulk power measurement to regulate feed rate, then process stability improves, but the system cannot effectively handle varying tool engagement conditions in bevel gear manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stabilityVSAvoidability to handle varying tool engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the adaptive control system adjustable and responsive to changing conditions. The control system dynamically modifies feed rate based on real-time power measurements and tool engagement detection, allowing it to adapt to varying tool engagement conditions throughout the machining process while maintaining process stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring tool spindle power and using this information to regulate feed rate. The system measures actual power consumption during machining and feeds this information back to the control algorithm, which then adjusts the feed rate to maintain optimal power levels and constant load per grit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If adaptive control systems are implemented in bevel gear manufacturing, then operator intervention is reduced, but operator expertise and tuning knowledge are required to set up the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of feed rate adjustmentVSAvoidsystem setup and tuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the adaptive control system to automatically detect tool engagement conditions and self-regulate feed rate without requiring operator intervention during machining. The system autonomously monitors power consumption, detects tool engagement variations, and adjusts feed rate automatically, eliminating the need for continuous operator monitoring and manual adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If constant bulk power is maintained during machining, then tool and workpiece damage is reduced, but load per grit varies drastically when tool engagement changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against tool and workpiece damageVSAvoidconstant load per grit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the feed rate parameter in response to detected tool engagement conditions. When tool engagement increases, the system reduces feed rate to maintain constant load per grit, and when engagement decreases, it increases feed rate. This parameter adjustment maintains both tool protection and optimal machining conditions throughout the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2576136B1Adaptive control of a machining process
Publication Date: 2015.09.02 THE GLEASON WORKS
  • EP2576136B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2576136B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2576136B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method of determining a desired power level (P) as a function of relative tool to workpiece position, thereby enabling adaptive control advantages that were previously inaccessible for machining, such as bevel gear grinding, from solid applications. Preferably, set point power is expressed as a function of specific power (?', P") and roll position (Q) for a generated gear or as a function of specific power and plunge position for a non-generated (i.e. Formate) gear. Specific power is defined and preferably remains as defined during machining even as process conditions vary during machining.