Adaptive Machining of Complex Component Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machining methods for complex components like gas turbine engine blades and vanes face challenges in adapting to geometric variations, requiring precise machining and repair while maintaining original design parameters and functionality.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive machining system that includes a component measuring device, numerical control machine, and a system controller with model transformation, offset distribution, and program modification units to compare electronic surface models with measured data, adjusting machining parameters to achieve a compromise between design intent and actual surface geometry, ensuring precise machining and repair.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machining methods are used for complex components, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to adapt to geometric variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface geometry precisionVSAvoidmachining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning of the component surface to obtain actual geometric data before machining. This advance measurement allows the machining parameters to be pre-adjusted based on the actual surface geometry, ensuring high precision without requiring complex real-time adjustments during the machining process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the scanned surface geometry data is continuously compared with the ideal design model, and the machining parameters are automatically adjusted based on the detected deviations. This closed-loop control ensures that the final surface geometry matches the design specifications with high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If adaptive machining with multiple scanning and adjustment steps is implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to increased process time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole location precisionVSAvoidmachining throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning and determines the actual surface geometry before machining operations. By pre-calculating the necessary adjustments to hole locations and orientations based on the scanned data, the system avoids time-consuming adjustments during machining, thus maintaining high productivity while achieving precise hole placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts machining parameters based on the scanned surface geometry. Rather than using fixed, conservative parameters that would require multiple passes, the system optimizes parameters in real-time based on actual surface conditions, reducing the number of machining passes required while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If rigid adherence to design surface data is maintained, then design intent is preserved, but adaptability deteriorates due to inability to accommodate actual surface variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface geometry adaptabilityVSAvoiddeviation from design intent
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously compares the scanned actual surface geometry with the ideal design model and uses this feedback to calculate compensatory adjustments. This allows the system to adapt to actual surface variations while systematically correcting deviations from design intent, achieving both adaptability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes machining parameters such as tool path offsets, hole location coordinates, and orientation angles based on the detected surface variations. By dynamically adjusting these parameters within acceptable tolerances, the system adapts to actual surface geometry while maintaining compliance with design specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2965159B1Adaptively machining component surfaces and hole drilling
Publication Date: 2020.05.06 ROLLS ROYCE CORP
  • EP2965159B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2965159B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2965159B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method includes receiving a design surface data set, obtaining a component surface data set from the inspection of a component, creating a modified surface data set in response to the design surface data set and the component surface data set, generating a machining path in response to the modified surface data set, and machining the component in response to the machining path to produce a machined component according to the modified surface data set. The machined component deviates from the design surface data set.