Adaptive Modulation Coding and Reference Signal Pattern Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face limitations in achieving optimal transmission efficiency and reliability due to the inability to adaptively adjust modulation coding schemes and reference signal patterns, especially in changing channel conditions such as ultra-high-speed scenarios, ultra-high-frequency communications, and high-reliability requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method for adaptively adjusting the Modulation Coding and Reference Signal Pattern Scheme (MCPS) index based on channel status information, which includes determining a MCPS index to configure the modulation scheme, modulation order, and Transport Block Size (TBS) to maximize transmission efficiency while ensuring a minimum Block Error Rate (BLER), using a look-up table that correlates reference signal patterns, modulation schemes, and channel conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed modulation coding scheme and reference signal pattern are used, then system complexity is reduced, but transmission efficiency deteriorates in varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidtransmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by enabling the system to switch between different reference signal patterns and modulation coding schemes based on real-time channel conditions. The terminal device selects appropriate reference signal patterns (first pattern for high mobility, second pattern for low mobility) and adjusts MCS indices according to measured channel status, transforming the static system into a dynamic one that optimizes transmission efficiency while managing complexity through conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key system parameters including reference signal pattern selection, modulation order, coding rate, and MCS index based on channel conditions such as mobility status and SINR measurements. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than maintaining fixed values, the system achieves improved transmission efficiency across varying channel conditions while keeping the adjustment rules standardized to control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If adaptive adjustment of modulation coding scheme and reference signal pattern is implemented, then transmission efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the adaptation process into distinct, manageable components: channel status measurement, mobility determination, reference signal pattern selection, and MCS index adjustment. Each component handles a specific aspect of the adaptation, making the overall complex system easier to implement and maintain through modular functional blocks rather than a monolithic complex algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the terminal device measures channel status (SINR, mobility), selects appropriate reference signal patterns and MCS indices, and reports selected parameters back to the network. This feedback loop enables adaptive optimization while distributing complexity between terminal and network, with each entity performing specific standardized functions rather than requiring full system-wide complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If higher order modulation schemes are used to increase transmission rate, then transmission efficiency is improved, but reliability deteriorates in poor channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission rateVSAvoidBlock Error Rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the modulation coding scheme by selecting different MCS indices based on real-time channel conditions including SINR measurements and mobility status. In poor channel conditions or high mobility scenarios, the system automatically selects more robust modulation and coding parameters, while in good conditions it transitions to higher order modulation for increased rate, thus dynamically balancing rate and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes modulation order and coding rate parameters based on channel quality indicators. By adjusting these parameters according to measured SINR and mobility conditions, the system achieves higher transmission rates in favorable conditions while maintaining reliability through more conservative parameter selection in poor conditions, optimizing the trade-off between rate and error performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If reference signal density is increased to improve channel estimation accuracy, then reliability is improved, but resource overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel estimation accuracyVSAvoidresource overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different reference signal patterns locally based on terminal mobility status and channel conditions. High mobility terminals receive reference signal patterns optimized for their specific channel characteristics, while low mobility terminals receive patterns optimized for their conditions. This local optimization achieves good channel estimation accuracy for each terminal type without requiring all terminals to use high-density reference signals, thus reducing overall resource overhead while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes reference signal pattern parameters (density, sequence, power) based on channel conditions and mobility status. By selecting appropriate reference signal patterns from multiple configured options rather than using a fixed high-density pattern for all terminals, the system achieves sufficient channel estimation accuracy for each scenario while optimizing resource overhead through conditional parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9800368B2Method, eNB, terminal and system for adaptively adjusting modulation coding scheme and reference signal pattern
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9800368B2 patent drawing
  • US9800368B2 patent drawing
  • US9800368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for adaptively adjusting a modulation coding scheme and a reference signal pattern. The method includes: determining a Modulation Coding and Reference Signal Pattern Scheme (MCPS) index according to channel status information, the MCPS being used for indicating a reference signal pattern, a modulation scheme and/or a modulation order and TBS; performing communication according to the reference signal pattern, modulation scheme and/or modulation order and TBS corresponding to the MCPS index. Another example of the present disclosure further provides a corresponding eNB, terminal and system. With examples of the present disclosure, the reference signal pattern and modulation coding scheme may be adaptively and jointly adjusted according to requirements to obtain the optimal transmission efficiency.