Adaptive MCS Table Selection for 5G Network Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems in new radio (5G) face inefficiencies in configuring modulation and coding scheme (MCS) tables, as they are typically set based on user equipment capabilities rather than performance data, leading to suboptimal spectral efficiency and throughput.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive selection and configuration of MCS tables based on performance data such as transmission scheme, user equipment location, antenna configuration, and feedback reporting mode, allowing the network node to dynamically switch between predefined MCS tables to optimize spectral efficiency and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If MCS tables are configured based on user equipment capabilities (256-QAM support), then device compatibility is ensured, but spectral efficiency and throughput are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidMCS configuration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic MCS table configuration where the network node can switch between different MCS tables (e.g., Table 4 and Table 5) based on real-time performance data such as channel quality indicator (CQI) reports, signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), and throughput measurements. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to transition from static capability-based configuration to performance-driven configuration, optimizing spectral efficiency while maintaining compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the configuration parameter from fixed capability-based selection to dynamic performance-based selection. By monitoring performance metrics like CQI, SINR, and throughput, the network node adjusts the MCS table configuration parameter to select the most appropriate table (Table 4 for lower order modulation or Table 5 for 256-QAM) based on current channel conditions and user equipment performance, rather than solely on device capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a single MCS table is configured for all user equipment, then system complexity is reduced, but network capacity and throughput are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidMCS configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the MCS configuration space into multiple tables (Table 4 and Table 5) with different modulation and coding characteristics. Table 4 is optimized for lower order modulation schemes while Table 5 supports 256-QAM and higher spectral efficiency. The network node selectively applies different tables to different user equipment or different time/frequency resources based on performance data, thereby increasing network capacity without requiring all devices to support all configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where user equipment periodically reports channel quality indicator (CQI) and other performance metrics to the network node. The network node uses this feedback information to dynamically select the appropriate MCS table configuration. This closed-loop feedback system enables the network to adapt to changing channel conditions and optimize network capacity while managing configuration complexity through automated decision-making based on reported metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10951349B2Adaptive configuration of modulation and coding scheme tables for new radio
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10951349B2 patent drawing
  • US10951349B2 patent drawing
  • US10951349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described technology is generally directed towards a network node in a radio communications system adaptively switching the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) table in use by user equipment. The network node evaluates performance data corresponding to one or more performance criteria to determine which MCS table to use. Non-limiting examples of performance data/performance criterion include the current transmission scheme, user equipment cell location, user equipment geometry, the number of transmit and/or receive antennas, the feedback reporting mode, the frequency band used in communications, network node performance, base station transmission power, user equipment deployment scenario, user equipment radio environment, user equipment recommendation, and the type of service being served by the base station. Any of the above performance data/performance criteria can be combined to adaptively make a determination and selection of which modulation and coding scheme table to use.