Adaptive Memory Resource Management via Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-processor computer systems face performance and energy optimization challenges due to varying access speeds and efficiencies across shared memory resources, with existing policy-based approaches failing to fully utilize complex system capacities.

Innovation Solution

The system employs self-learning techniques, specifically reinforcement learning and neural networks, to adaptively manage memory resources by reorganizing data blocks across different levels of the memory hierarchy, optimizing memory allocation between fast and slow memory resources based on performance metrics and patterns of execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If processors access shared memory resources in multi-processor systems, then system capacity and functionality are increased, but performance and energy efficiency deteriorate due to varying access speeds and contention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic memory resource management where the system continuously monitors performance metrics and automatically adjusts memory allocation and data block placement. The policy manager dynamically migrates data blocks between memory devices based on real-time access patterns, making the memory hierarchy adaptive rather than static, thereby resolving the contradiction between system capacity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-learning techniques where the performance monitor and policy manager automatically optimize memory resource allocation without external intervention. The system learns from execution patterns and autonomously makes decisions about data block placement, enabling the system to self-optimize performance while maintaining high capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If processors access shared memory resources, then system functionality is enhanced, but energy consumption increases due to inefficient access patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the performance monitor continuously observes memory access patterns and feeds this information back to the policy manager. The policy manager uses this feedback to adjust data block placement strategies, migrating blocks to faster memory devices when access frequency increases, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining enhanced system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically by adjusting data block placement based on monitored performance metrics. When access patterns indicate frequent usage, the system changes the memory device parameter for that data block, moving it to a faster, more energy-efficient location, thus resolving the energy consumption issue while preserving functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If data blocks are migrated between memory devices to optimize performance, then instructions per clock cycle increase, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstructions per clock cycleVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a policy manager as an intermediary component that mediates between the performance monitor and the memory subsystem. This intermediary abstracts the complexity of migration decisions, implementing policies that balance performance optimization with system complexity management. The policy manager serves as a buffer that handles the computational burden of decision-making, preventing excessive system complexity while achieving performance gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial migration actions rather than comprehensive reorganization. The policy manager selects specific data blocks for migration based on performance metrics, performing only the necessary actions to achieve performance improvement. This partial action approach avoids the excessive complexity that would result from complete memory reorganization while still achieving IPC improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of manufacture

If existing policy-based approaches are used for memory management, then implementation is straightforward, but system capacity utilization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidsystem capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-learning techniques where the system automatically adapts to optimize memory resource utilization without requiring manual policy configuration. The performance monitor and policy manager work together to learn execution patterns and autonomously make optimization decisions, eliminating the need for expert knowledge while maximizing system capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs continuous feedback loops where performance metrics are monitored and used to adjust memory management decisions in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables the system to automatically adapt to changing workloads and optimize capacity utilization without requiring manual intervention or complex policy configuration, thus maintaining ease of implementation while improving utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11561834B2Methods and systems for adaptive memory-resource management
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 RAMBUS INC
  • US11561834B2 patent drawing
  • US11561834B2 patent drawing
  • US11561834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are self-learning systems and methods for adaptive management of memory resources within a memory hierarchy. Memory allocations associated with different active functions are organized into blocks for placement in alternative levels in a memory hierarchy optimized for different metrics of e.g. cost and performance. A host processor monitors a performance metric of the active functions, such as the number of instructions per clock cycle, and reorganizes the function-specific blocks among the levels of the hierarchy. Over time, this process tends toward block organizations that improve the performance metric.