Adaptive Finite Element Mesh Error Recovery for AM Simulation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Additive manufacturing simulations face challenges with increasing complexity and size, leading to inefficient and inaccurate finite element analysis due to cubic runtime and memory consumption, especially for large and complex parts, which results in residual stress-induced failures and loss of dimensional accuracy.
Innovation Solution
An adaptive finite element mesh approach that includes error recovery through iterative coarsening and displacement field calculations, maintaining fine mesh detail by combining elements when coarsening criteria are met, and using finite-element analysis to calculate a fine displacement field.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If a fine finite element mesh is used to maintain simulation accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to cubic increase in runtime and memory consumption
Solution Approach 1:
The mesh is segmented into different regions with different resolutions. Fine mesh regions are applied only where high accuracy is needed (e.g., areas with complex geometry or high stress gradients), while coarse mesh regions are used in areas where lower accuracy is acceptable. This segmentation allows the simulation to maintain precision in critical areas while reducing overall computational burden.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements local quality by assigning different mesh densities to different spatial locations based on local requirements. Adaptive mesh refinement algorithms identify regions requiring fine resolution (such as areas with high stress concentrations or geometric complexity) and apply fine mesh only there, while using coarse mesh in other regions. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by concentrating computational resources where they provide maximum benefit to accuracy.
2Adaptability or versatility
If model size is increased to simulate larger and more complex parts, then adaptability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to cubic increase in computational resources
Solution Approach 1:
Large complex models are segmented into smaller submodels or analysis regions that can be processed independently or in parallel. This segmentation allows the simulation framework to handle larger overall model sizes by dividing the computational task into manageable pieces, reducing the cubic scaling impact on runtime while maintaining the ability to simulate complex geometries.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs dynamic mesh adaptation where the mesh density and distribution are adjusted during the simulation process based on evolving stress fields, temperature gradients, or other physical parameters. This dynamic adjustment allows the model to maintain high accuracy in regions of interest while using coarser representation elsewhere, enabling simulation of larger and more complex parts without proportional increases in computational cost.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of simulating additive manufacturing, including determining a first displacement field on a first adaptive finite element mesh of an object; determining a second adaptive finite element mesh by adding an additional element group to the first adaptive finite element mesh, and when coarsening criteria is met, generating at least one coarse element by coarsening two or more elements of the first adaptive finite element mesh; calculating, from the first displacement field, a second displacement field on the determined second adaptive finite element mesh; determining an error between the first and second displacement fields; calculating a displacement field change on the determined second adaptive finite element mesh using a finite-element analysis model; and calculating a fine displacement field on a fine finite element mesh by adding together the second displacement field, the determined error, and the calculated displacement field change.


