Adaptive Microjoint Width for Collision-Free Workpiece Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining microjoint width and position in workpiece machining are inadequate, leading to microjoints that are either too wide, making removal difficult, or too narrow, causing workpiece parts to tilt or collide with machining tools, due to insufficient consideration of machining parameters and workpiece properties.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the minimum microjoint width based on machining parameters such as cutting gas pressure, acceleration, and static friction, along with workpiece properties like material properties and geometry, to ensure secure attachment and prevent tilting or collisions during machining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed microjoint width is used for all workpiece parts, then programming is simplified, but small workpiece parts have microjoints that are too wide causing removal difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming complexityVSAvoidmicrojoint removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The microjoint width is made dynamic and adaptive rather than fixed. The system automatically calculates and adjusts the microjoint width based on workpiece-specific parameters (area, perimeter, thickness) and machining parameters (gas pressure, acceleration) for each individual workpiece part, allowing optimal width variation across different parts while maintaining automated programming

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of microjoint width from a constant value to a variable parameter that is calculated based on multiple factors including workpiece area, perimeter, thickness, material density, cutting gas pressure, and machining acceleration. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing width for each part's specific conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed microjoint width is used for all workpiece parts, then programming is simplified, but collision prevention during machining is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming complexityVSAvoidcollision prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The microjoint width adapts dynamically to prevent collisions by considering the specific geometry and mass distribution of each workpiece part. Larger or more vulnerable parts receive wider microjoints for secure attachment, while smaller parts receive narrower microjoints appropriate to their size, all calculated automatically by the programming system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies the microjoint width parameter based on workpiece characteristics and machining conditions, including gas pressure effects and acceleration forces, to ensure each part has sufficient attachment security appropriate to its specific collision risk profile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If larger microjoint width is used, then workpiece part attachment security is improved, but subsequent work to remove attachment marks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidremoval work time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes microjoint width to the minimum necessary value based on calculated parameters including workpiece area, perimeter, thickness, material density, gas pressure, and acceleration. This prevents excessive width that would create large attachment marks requiring removal, while still providing sufficient security for each specific part

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The programming system automatically calculates and sets the optimal microjoint width without requiring manual intervention or subsequent removal work. The system serves itself by determining the precise width needed for each part, eliminating the need for operators to manually remove excessive attachment marks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12617040B2Method for determining a minimum width and an attachment position of a microjoint and method for machining a workpiece
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US12617040B2 patent drawing
  • US12617040B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a minimum width of a microjoint by which, when machining a workpiece, in particular a sheet-like workpiece, a workpiece part remains connected to a remaining workpiece of the workpiece. In the method, the minimum width of the microjoint is determined in dependence on at least one machining parameter which influences a relative position of the workpiece part in relation to the remaining workpiece during the machining of the workpiece. A further method determines an attachment position of such a microjoint and a still further method machines the workpiece.