Adaptive Motion Sensor System for Asset Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing asset tracking systems consume excessive power and bandwidth due to frequent position reporting, leading to reduced battery life and increased maintenance costs, as they often send redundant data when assets are stationary.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an adaptive motion sensor system that detects movement and sends position information only when changes occur, using configurable thresholds and filtering to minimize unnecessary data transmission, thereby extending battery life and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If frequent reporting cycles are used to increase visibility into mobile assets, then position information accuracy is improved, but battery life deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition information accuracyVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts reporting frequency based on asset motion state. When the asset is in motion, position reports are generated at a higher frequency to track movement accurately. When the asset is stationary, reporting frequency is reduced or suspended to conserve battery power. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making reporting intensity match the actual need for position tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the reporting parameter (frequency) based on the asset's state. By detecting motion through sensors or GPS velocity data, the system switches between different reporting modes: high-frequency reporting during motion and low-frequency or idle reporting during stationary periods. This parameter change allows the system to maintain position accuracy when needed while extending battery life during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If increased number of reporting cycles are used to improve asset tracking, then visibility into asset status is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility into asset statusVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic reporting where the number of reporting cycles adjusts based on asset activity. During motion, reporting cycles increase to maintain visibility into asset status. During stationary periods, reporting cycles decrease to reduce power consumption. This dynamic behavior ensures information visibility is maintained when necessary while minimizing energy usage during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous periodic reporting, the system uses event-driven periodic action where reporting is triggered by motion detection events. The system monitors for motion events and initiates reporting cycles only when motion is detected, rather than maintaining constant periodic reporting. This approach maintains asset visibility during active periods while dramatically reducing power consumption during stationary periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If motion detection thresholds are lowered to detect all movements, then detection precision is improved, but false arrivals and departures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion detection precisionVSAvoidaccuracy of arrival and departure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments motion detection into multiple stages or layers. First, a sensitive initial detection stage identifies potential motion events. Then, a verification stage filters these events using additional criteria such as motion duration, velocity thresholds, or pattern recognition. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high detection sensitivity while eliminating false positives through multi-stage validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where detected motion events are validated against historical data, expected patterns, or additional sensor inputs before being classified as arrivals or departures. The system learns from false positives and adjusts detection parameters accordingly, using feedback loops to improve the reliability of motion detection over time while maintaining sensitivity to actual movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7498925B2System and method for reporting a status of an asset
Publication Date: 2009.03.03 BIOPAY LLC
  • US7498925B2 patent drawing
  • US7498925B2 patent drawing
  • US7498925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for reporting a status of an asset is described. In one embodiment, an asset status is determined based on configurable parameters to thereby enable accurate reporting of departures and arrivals of an asset.