Adaptive Motor Failure Prediction for Changing IoT Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning models for predicting industrial motor failures in IoT networks face challenges such as high costs for obtaining operating data, significant variations among motors, and environmental changes, making the train-freeze-deploy approach ineffective for accurate failure prediction.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using evolutionary machine learning models trained on performance indicator data, deployed on one board computers, which continue to improve their predictions using operational data from sensors, allowing for real-time monitoring and urgent alerts when failure probability exceeds 80%, and incorporating data from various sources like factory, cloud, or hybrid data sets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the train-freeze-deploy machine learning model is used for motor failure prediction in IoT networks, then the initial prediction capability is established, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to inability to adapt to motor variations and environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor failure prediction accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to motor variations and environmental changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model transitions from a static frozen state to a dynamic adaptive state by implementing continuous learning capabilities at the edge device. The model periodically retrains using newly collected operational data from multiple motors, allowing it to adapt to variations in motor characteristics and environmental conditions while maintaining prediction accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where actual motor operational data and failure outcomes are continuously collected and fed back into the training process. This feedback loop enables the model to learn from real-world performance, correct prediction errors, and improve its prediction accuracy for future motor failures while adapting to different motor types and operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple machine learning models are trained on historical data from various sources, then the initial prediction coverage is improved, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction coverage across different motor typesVSAvoidcomputational complexity of training and deploying multiple models
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the machine learning workload by training multiple specialized models for different motor types, sizes, and applications separately. Each model is optimized for its specific motor category, improving prediction accuracy for that segment. The edge device then deploys only the relevant models needed for the specific motors being monitored, reducing the overall computational burden compared to using a single universal model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The edge device is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple motor types and model types through a unified architecture. It can load, execute, and manage different machine learning models for various motor categories (e.g., AC motors, DC motors, induction motors, synchronous motors) on a single platform, reducing hardware complexity while maintaining broad prediction coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of motor indicators is implemented, then the ability to detect early failure signs is improved, but the energy consumption and operational costs of IoT devices increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of early motor failure indicatorsVSAvoidenergy consumption of edge devices for continuous monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic sampling of motor operational indicators instead of truly continuous monitoring. Sensors collect data at optimized intervals based on motor operating conditions and prediction model requirements. This periodic approach maintains sufficient detection precision for early failure signs while significantly reducing the energy consumption and processing load on battery-powered edge devices compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors a selective subset of the most critical motor indicators (e.g., vibration, temperature, current) rather than all possible parameters. By focusing on the key indicators that provide the highest predictive value for motor failure, the system achieves effective early detection capability with reduced sensor requirements, lower data processing demands, and decreased energy consumption on edge devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12007753B2System and method for predicting industrial equipment motor behavior
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 ONE TECH INC
  • US12007753B2 patent drawing
  • US12007753B2 patent drawing
  • US12007753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method and system for predicting motor failure. The system and method employ artificial intelligence to train machine learning models to predict failure mechanisms within a machine. The system features at least one database configured to store machine performance indicator data. At least one server is configured to receive the indicator data and train machine learning models which are used by a processor to predict motor failure. The method for predicting motor failure is iterative, allowing the machine learning model to become more skilled at predicting machine performance outcomes in real-time.