Adaptive Network Probing Mode Selection for Dynamic Path Tracing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network monitoring techniques struggle with selecting the appropriate method for packet tracing and path tracing, leading to outdated decisions and inefficient data collection due to the dynamic nature of computer networks, which can result in low-value information or inability to collect data effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically selects between path tracing and metric collection modes based on network telemetry, using machine learning to adapt to network changes and ensure optimal probing strategies for agents in computer networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a network administrator manually selects the probing technique, then the initial selection can be made with expertise, but the decision becomes outdated quickly due to network dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobing technique effectivenessVSAvoidtime for manual reconfiguration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the agent to automatically select and switch between probing techniques (path tracing, packet tracing, metric collection) based on real-time network conditions. The agent monitors network telemetry and autonomously determines the most effective technique without requiring manual reconfiguration by administrators, thus resolving the contradiction between reliable probing and the time loss from manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the probing technique selection adaptive and dynamic rather than static. The system continuously monitors network conditions and switches between different probing techniques based on current network state, ensuring the probing remains effective despite network changes. This dynamic adaptation eliminates the need for manual reconfiguration and maintains reliability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the agent uses a fixed probing technique, then the setup is simple, but the agent cannot adapt to network changes and may collect low-value information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to network dynamicsVSAvoidprobing strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by enabling the agent to switch between different probing techniques (path tracing, packet tracing, metric collection) based on real-time network conditions. The agent monitors network telemetry and automatically adjusts its probing strategy to match current network state, providing adaptability without requiring complex manual configuration. This resolves the contradiction by making the system dynamically responsive rather than statically complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by having the agent continuously monitor network telemetry and use this information to determine which probing technique is most effective. The feedback loop allows the agent to adjust its behavior based on actual network conditions, ensuring it collects high-value information while maintaining relatively simple operation. The feedback mechanism bridges adaptability and simplicity by automating the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the agent collects network information using a selected technique, then data collection can be performed, but the agent may be unable to continue collecting information as network conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection continuityVSAvoidautomatic mode selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the agent to automatically monitor network conditions and switch between probing techniques without external intervention. The agent independently determines when to transition from one technique to another based on network telemetry, ensuring continuous reliable data collection. This self-service capability maintains reliability while implementing automation, resolving the contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the continuity principle by ensuring the agent maintains continuous effective data collection through automatic technique switching. When network conditions change make the current technique ineffective, the agent seamlessly transitions to an alternative technique, preventing interruption in useful action. This continuity of useful action resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliable data collection while implementing automatic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260052087A1Automatic selection of probe and path tracing modes
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260052087A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052087A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052087A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one implementation, a device receives, via a user interface, an instruction to automate probing strategy formation for an agent in a computer network. The device obtains network telemetry from the computer network. The device selects, using the network telemetry, between a path tracing mode and a metric collection mode to form a probing strategy for the agent, based on the instruction. The device instructs the agent in the computer network to send one or more packets via the computer network according to the probing strategy.