Adaptive Neural Network Architecture for Human Affect Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cognitive architectures lack comprehensive integration of perception, problem-solving, and emotional responses, failing to model flexible human behaviors and adapt to dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

The development of an adaptive neural network (ANN) system, designated 'human affect computer modeling' (HACM), which integrates sensory input, cognitive learning, and execution modules to recognize, interpret, and simulate human reactions and affects, utilizing real-time reinforcement learning and CMAC neural networks for parallel processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cognitive architectures (ACT-R, Soar) are used, then rule-based control and production systems are established, but the system lacks flexibility to respond to dynamic internal or external changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidresponse flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a hybrid architecture that combines static rule-based production systems with dynamic neural network components. The neural networks continuously learn and adapt to dynamic internal and external changes, while the production system provides stable rule-based control, resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges two different architectural approaches: traditional production systems (ACT-R, Soar) and neural network models. This combination allows the system to leverage the strengths of both - the interpretability and control of production systems and the adaptability and learning capacity of neural networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid propositional representations are used, then structural constraints are maintained, but the system cannot model flexible human behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural constraintVSAvoidbehavior flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from rigid propositional representations to continuous-valued neural network representations. This parameter change allows the system to maintain structural constraints through architecture design while gaining flexibility through continuous activation values and distributed representations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite representational system that combines symbolic propositional representations with subsymbolic neural network activations. This composite approach maintains the interpretability of symbolic representations while incorporating the flexibility of continuous-valued neural activations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If perception is treated as a peripheral activity separate from problem solving, then modular architecture is maintained, but comprehensive integration of perception and problem solving is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearchitectural modularityVSAvoidperception-problem solving integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges previously separate perception and problem-solving modules into an integrated architecture. Neural networks serve as both perception processors and problem-solving engines, with shared representations and continuous interaction between perceptual input and cognitive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements multi-functional neural network components that simultaneously perform perception, representation, and problem-solving functions. The same neural network structures are used across different cognitive tasks, achieving comprehensive integration while maintaining architectural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12505347B2Continuously learning and optimizing artificial intelligence (AI) adaptive neural network (ANN) computer modeling methods and systems
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 L2 HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12505347B2 patent drawing
  • US12505347B2 patent drawing
  • US12505347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Continuously learning and optimizing artificial intelligence (AI) adaptive neural network (ANN) computer modeling methods and systems, designated human affect computer modeling (HACM) or affective neuron (AN), and, more particularly, to AI methods, systems and devices that can recognize, interpret, process and simulate human reactions and affects such as emotional responses to internal and external sensory stimuli, that provides real-time reinforcement learning modeling that reproduces human affects and/or reactions, wherein the human affect modeling (HACM) can be used singularly or collectively to modeling and predict complex human reactions and affects.