Adaptive Neural Network for Human Affect Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cognitive architectures lack comprehensive integration of perception, problem-solving, and natural language, failing to model flexible human behaviors and emotions effectively, and are not amenable to implementation as stand-alone or hybrid neuro-AI systems.

Innovation Solution

The development of an adaptive neural network (ANN) system, 'human affect computer modeling' (HACM) that recognizes, interprets, and simulates human reactions and affects through a sensory input collection, cognitive learning, and execution module, using a Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC) for real-time reinforcement learning, enabling the prediction and reproduction of human affects and reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional cognitive architectures (ACT-R, Soar) are used, then rule-based problem solving is achieved, but flexibility in responding to dynamic internal or external changes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in responding to dynamic changesVSAvoidcomplexity of cognitive architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static rule-based systems to a dynamic neural network architecture that continuously adapts its weights and structure. The HACM system uses learning control with multiple parallel processing pathways that can dynamically adjust to new inputs and contexts, enabling flexible responses to changing conditions without requiring complex rule reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through autonomous learning and adaptation mechanisms. The neural network automatically adjusts its parameters and pathways based on input data without external intervention, performing self-organization and continuous optimization of its cognitive models, thereby reducing the need for manual system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive brain-like architecture is implemented, then integration of physiology, anatomy and functionalities is achieved, but implementation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive cognitive modeling capabilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity of neural architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive brain-like architecture into distinct functional modules including sensory input collection, cognitive learning, execution, and optimization components. Each module handles specific cognitive functions independently, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive modeling capability while managing implementation complexity through modular design and parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If rigid propositional representations are used, then structural constraints are maintained, but modeling of flexible human behavior is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling of flexible human behaviorVSAvoidstructural constraint of representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs parameter changes by transforming rigid propositional representations into flexible vector-based representations with adjustable dimensions and properties. The neural network modifies these parameters dynamically during learning, enabling the system to model flexible human behaviors while maintaining sufficient structural constraints through the underlying vector space architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11138503B2Continuously learning and optimizing artificial intelligence (AI) adaptive neural network (ANN) computer modeling methods and systems
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 L2 HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11138503B2 patent drawing
  • US11138503B2 patent drawing
  • US11138503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Continuously learning and optimizing artificial intelligence (AI) adaptive neural network (ANN) computer modeling methods and systems, designated human affect computer modeling (HACM) or affective neuron (AN), and, more particularly, to AI methods, systems and devices that can recognize, interpret, process and simulate human reactions and affects such as emotional responses to internal and external sensory stimuli, that provides real-time reinforcement learning modeling that reproduces human affects and/or reactions, wherein the human affect modeling (HACM) can be used singularly or collectively to modeling and predict complex human reactions and affects.