Adaptive Neurotraining Interface With tES-Guided Task Presentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing training systems are ineffective in addressing speech and language disabilities, cognitive impairments, and social impairments associated with neurological conditions such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, neurodegenerative disorders, and neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly in improving language and cognitive skills.

Innovation Solution

A training system that provides electrical brain stimulation synchronized with tasks, using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to enhance neuronal activity, combined with real-time feedback and adaptive task presentation based on user capability and cognitive load monitoring, to improve language and cognitive functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing training systems are used, then the training can be provided, but the training is ineffective in addressing speech and language disabilities, cognitive impairments, and social impairments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidskill acquisition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training system dynamically adapts task difficulty and provides real-time feedback based on continuous monitoring of user capability and cognitive load. The system adjusts stimulation parameters and task presentation adaptively to match the user's evolving neurological state, transforming a static training approach into a dynamic, responsive system that optimizes learning effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms that monitor user performance, cognitive load, and neurological responses. This feedback loop enables the system to adjust training parameters, modify task difficulty, and optimize stimulation delivery based on actual user response, thereby improving training effectiveness and accelerating skill acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If electrical brain stimulation is provided without individualization, then the training can be delivered efficiently, but the training cannot address individual user needs and cognitive states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining delivery efficiencyVSAvoidindividualization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic adaptation to individualize the training experience by continuously monitoring user capability and cognitive load. Task difficulty, stimulation parameters, and feedback mechanisms are adjusted in real-time to match each user's unique neurological state, enabling both efficient delivery and high individualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies key parameters including task difficulty level, stimulation intensity, and feedback timing based on real-time assessment of user capability and cognitive load. These parameter changes enable the system to optimize training delivery for each individual user while maintaining overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If task difficulty is not individualized, then the training system is simpler to operate, but the training cannot optimize for user capability and cognitive load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidtraining optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically monitoring user capability and cognitive load, then adapting task difficulty and stimulation parameters accordingly. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for manual configuration while optimizing training delivery for each user's unique needs, maintaining simplicity of operation alongside high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback mechanisms automatically adjust task difficulty and stimulation parameters based on user performance and cognitive state monitoring. This closed-loop feedback system optimizes training delivery without requiring user intervention or complex manual setup, preserving ease of operation while enhancing training optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of language and cognitive training by individualizing task difficulty and providing targeted stimulation, leading to improved neuronal plasticity and accelerated skill acquisition.

Implementation Method 1

providing an electrical stimulation treatment to the brain region of the user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTranscranial electrical stimulation (tES): Electric Field

Data Source

PatentEP4200007B1Training system with interaction assist feature, training arrangement and training
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 NEURO DEVICE GROUP SA
  • EP4200007B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4200007B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4200007B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A training system (100) for a training of a first user (2a) is provided and comprises a) a computer program product comprising program code (P1) which, when loaded and executed on an electronic control unit (1), provides an operational control system (200), and/or b) an electronic control unit with a program code (P1), wherein the program code, when executed on the electronic control unit, provides an operation control system. The operation control system is configured to control the training of the first user and comprises a plurality of training functionalities. The training functionalities comprise a data generation functionality (201) configured to produce user capability data, wherein the user capability data are indicative for the capability of the first user in content processing. Furthermore, the training functionalities comprise a presentation functionality (202) which is configured to cause the electronic control unit to issue a presentation command depending on the user capability data in order to present a feature via a user interface (2, 3). The feature may be related to the capability of the first user in content processing.