Adaptive Noise Suppression Gain for Speech Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise suppressors in communication systems often apply excessive or insufficient noise reduction, leading to artifacts like musical noise, and struggle to maintain optimal signal quality due to fixed gain settings.

Innovation Solution

A noise suppression system that dynamically adjusts the minimum overall gain based on time-varying signal-to-noise ratio improvements, using a post-filtering analyzer and minimum gain adapter to calculate and control the gain on a frame-by-frame basis, ensuring effective noise reduction while preserving voice quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed gain settings are used in noise suppressors, then device complexity is reduced, but noise suppression performance deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying signal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppression performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic gain adjustment by continuously adapting the gain parameter based on real-time signal-to-noise ratio measurements and voice activity detection. The system transitions from fixed gain settings to time-varying gain control, allowing the noise suppressor to respond to changing acoustic conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through algorithmic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the gain parameter dynamically based on measured signal characteristics. By monitoring the signal-to-noise ratio and voice activity status, the system adjusts the gain parameter to optimize noise suppression performance for different operating conditions, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high-level noise suppression is applied, then signal-to-noise ratio is improved, but speech quality deteriorates due to excessive attenuation and distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidspeech quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different gain levels to different time segments based on local signal characteristics. By detecting voice activity and signal-to-noise ratio in specific time windows, the system applies aggressive suppression only when noise dominates and minimal suppression when speech is present, preserving speech quality while improving overall signal-to-noise ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by applying noise suppression selectively rather than continuously. The system applies strong suppression only when noise is detected and speech is absent, while using gentle or no suppression when speech is present, thus achieving partial suppression that optimizes the trade-off between signal-to-noise ratio improvement and speech quality preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If spectral weighting is used for noise reduction, then noise suppression is achieved, but artifacts such as musical noise are introduced in the output signal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidartifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic re-evaluation of signal characteristics through frame-by-frame analysis. By continuously measuring signal-to-noise ratio and voice activity in successive time frames, the system periodically updates its suppression strategy, preventing the accumulation of artifacts and allowing recovery of natural signal characteristics between suppression events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS7555075B2Adjustable noise suppression system
Publication Date: 2009.06.30 NXP USA INC
  • US7555075B2 patent drawing
  • US7555075B2 patent drawing
  • US7555075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and corresponding systems for suppressing noise in an input signal include setting a minimum overall gain in a noise reduction processor for processing a first frame of data associated with the input signal. In response to a new minimum overall gain being set, the minimum overall gain in the noise reduction processor is replaced with the new minimum overall gain, and a second frame of data associated with the input signal is processed to suppress noise using the new minimum overall gain. The new minimum overall gain can be a function of the input signal or an output signal of the noise reduction processor. The new minimum overall gain can correspond to a difference between an estimated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement that is calculated using time-domain data and a target SNR improvement.