Adaptive Olfactory Threshold Testing With Bayesian Trial Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional olfactory tests are inefficient and cumbersome, often requiring the same set of trials for all users, failing to account for individual differences in olfactory abilities, and are challenging for elderly or cognitively impaired individuals, while odor detection tests are underutilized due to stimulus control and duration issues.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method using an adaptive Bayesian algorithm guides users through a customizable series of olfactory trials, adjusting based on individual responses to optimize the number and type of trials needed to determine an accurate odor detection threshold, utilizing a software application and physical test cards with varying odorant concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional olfactory tests use the same set of trials for all users, then the test structure is simple and easy to administer, but the test efficiency is low and does not account for individual differences in olfactory abilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest efficiencyVSAvoidtest structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic test adaptation where the trial sequence is automatically adjusted based on real-time user responses. The system transitions from a static, fixed trial structure to a dynamic structure that adapts to individual performance, optimizing the number and difficulty of trials for each user while maintaining ease of administration through automated computerized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes test parameters (trial difficulty, concentration levels, number of trials) based on user performance. The computerized platform automatically modifies these parameters in real-time, allowing the test to adapt to individual olfactory abilities without requiring complex manual adjustment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If odor detection tests are administered with sufficient trials to ensure accuracy, then the measurement precision is high, but the test duration becomes excessive and stimulus control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodor detection threshold accuracyVSAvoidtest duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by administering only the necessary number of trials required to achieve accurate threshold measurement for each individual user. Rather than requiring all users to complete a fixed large number of trials, the system stops when sufficient precision is achieved, reducing overall test duration while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback from user responses to adjust the number and difficulty of subsequent trials. This feedback mechanism allows the test to converge on the odor detection threshold efficiently, avoiding unnecessary trials while ensuring sufficient data for accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If traditional olfactory tests require cognitive tasks like odor identification and discrimination, then comprehensive olfactory assessment is achieved, but the ease of operation decreases for elderly or cognitively impaired individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-friendly testingVSAvoidcomprehensive olfactory assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the core detection function from the complex identification and discrimination tasks. By focusing specifically on odor detection threshold measurement rather than requiring full identification or discrimination capabilities, the system simplifies the cognitive demands while still providing valuable olfactory assessment data for populations with cognitive impairments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the assessment parameters from complex cognitive tasks (identification, discrimination) to simpler detection tasks. This parameter change makes the test more accessible to elderly and cognitively impaired individuals while still providing meaningful olfactory function data through threshold measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12548641B2Methods and techniques for processing responses of an olfactory test
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US12548641B2 patent drawing
  • US12548641B2 patent drawing
  • US12548641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An olfactory test comprising an olfactory test article including a plurality of trials that each has an associated concentration of a stimulus of interest. Aspects of the present disclosure further relate to software application that guides a user through conducting the olfactory test based at least in part on the user's responses to trials of the olfactory test article, such that the user can be guided through a custom order of trials, and therefore different concentrations of the stimuli of interest, based at least in part on the user's responses to the trials as the user performs the olfactory test.