Clinical Decision Support for Adaptive Opioid Dose Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for opioid tapering lack personalized and adjustable approaches, leading to high failure rates due to withdrawal symptoms, anxiety, and lack of real-time monitoring and evidence-based adjustments, resulting in 67% failure rates.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning algorithms to generate personalized, non-linear glide paths for opioid dosage reduction, incorporating patient monitoring data to adjust the glide path dynamically and provide real-time support for side effects and anxiety management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed linear reduction schedule is used for opioid tapering, then the treatment protocol is simple and easy to implement, but the failure rate is high due to lack of personalization and inability to adjust for individual patient responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidtreatment success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms static fixed schedules into dynamic adaptive glide paths that automatically adjust dosage reduction rates based on real-time patient monitoring data. The machine learning model continuously updates the tapering schedule to optimize for individual patient responses, thereby improving success rates while maintaining ease of operation through automated adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where patient monitoring data (withdrawal symptoms, anxiety levels, side effects) is fed back into the machine learning model. This feedback enables the system to learn from patient responses and automatically adjust the glide path parameters, resolving the contradiction between simple implementation and high success rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time patient monitoring and machine learning adjustments are implemented, then treatment success rate improves through personalized care, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment success rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-service mechanisms where the machine learning model autonomously processes monitoring data and generates adjusted glide paths without requiring complex manual intervention. The automated nature of the system reduces operational complexity despite the advanced algorithms, as the system serves itself by making real-time decisions based on patient data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions into a unified platform: monitoring data collection, machine learning analysis, glide path generation, and adjustment recommendations. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise be separate complex systems into a single coherent tool, improving success rates without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If standardized fixed schedules are provided to all patients, then resource consumption is low and implementation is straightforward, but patient-specific needs are not met leading to high abandonment rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes key parameters of the tapering schedule (reduction rate, timing, dosage adjustments) based on individual patient characteristics and real-time responses. Instead of fixed parameters for all patients, the machine learning model optimizes parameters for each patient's unique profile, achieving personalization without excessive resource consumption through efficient algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12475984B2Techniques for providing interactive clinical decision support for drug dosage reduction
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 RXASSURANCE CORP D B A OPISAFE
  • US12475984B2 patent drawing
  • US12475984B2 patent drawing
  • US12475984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples described herein generally relate to recommending drug dosage reductions for a patient. A computer system may generate an initial non-linear glide path of recommended dosages starting at an initial dosage of a drug for a patient and ending at a goal dosage at an estimated time of arrival. The system may receive periodic patient monitoring including at least one drug withdrawal scale score, anxiety scale score, and indicated side effect. The system may determine, using one or more machine learning algorithms, a revised glide path based on a data record for the patient, the at least the drug withdrawal scale score and the at least one anxiety scale score for the patient. The system may recommend at least one medication or therapy for the indicated side effect. The system may determine a prescription adjustment based on the revised glide path.