Adaptive Optical Fuzzer for Camera Navigation Disruption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical sensors in autonomous vehicles are labor-intensive to exploit manually and often require one-off solutions that only work at night, lacking the ability to adapt to environmental changes and target behavior.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learning system is trained to control an array of light emitters to disrupt navigation systems by adapting light modulation patterns based on feedback from optical sensors, enabling automated and adaptable optical exploits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual configuration of optical exploits is performed, then the exploit can be tailored to specific sensor behavior, but the process becomes labor-intensive and requires expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploit precisionVSAvoidexploit development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-testing and self-characterization by automatically probing the target sensor's response to various optical stimuli. The computational system autonomously determines the sensor's behavior patterns without requiring manual configuration or expert knowledge, enabling rapid exploit generation while maintaining precision through automated feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by monitoring the target sensor's output in response to emitted optical patterns and using this information to iteratively refine and optimize exploits. The computational system adjusts light emission parameters based on real-time sensor responses, achieving both precision and automation through adaptive feedback mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If fixed optical exploit patterns are used, then the exploit can be reliably reproduced, but it cannot adapt to environmental changes or different operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploit reproducibilityVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, fixed exploit patterns to dynamic, adaptive patterns that automatically adjust to environmental conditions. The computational system continuously modifies light emission characteristics based on real-time sensor feedback and environmental monitoring, maintaining both reliability through systematic adaptation and versatility across different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system exploits and adapts to changes in optical parameters such as wavelength, intensity, and temporal patterns. By systematically varying these parameters and observing sensor responses, the system generates exploits that are both reproducible through controlled parameter changes and adaptable to different environmental conditions through automated parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If optical exploits are designed for specific nighttime conditions, then they can effectively target sensor vulnerabilities, but they fail to work in daytime or varying lighting conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor vulnerability exploitationVSAvoidlighting condition versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal exploit generation platform that can effectively target sensor vulnerabilities across all lighting conditions. By using computational algorithms to analyze sensor responses and generate optimized optical patterns, the system achieves multi-functionality that works equally well at night, during daytime, and in varying lighting conditions, eliminating the need for condition-specific exploit designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces fixed, mechanically-designed optical exploit patterns with computationally-generated patterns. This substitution allows the exploits to be dynamically optimized for any lighting condition through algorithmic analysis of sensor responses, rather than relying on pre-configured patterns that only work under specific conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated machine learning systems are used to generate optical exploits, then productivity and adaptability improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexploit generation speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a computational system as an intermediary between the light emission hardware and the target sensor. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of automated exploit generation through software-based machine learning algorithms, keeping the hardware architecture relatively simple while achieving high productivity and adaptability through intelligent software control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250285421A1Optical Fuzzer
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 SEN ROBI
  • US20250285421A1 patent drawing
  • US20250285421A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine-learning system is trained to adapt light transmitted from an array of light emitters in order to disrupt a navigation system that employs a camera. Training comprises receiving image-processing outputs and/or navigation signals from the navigation system; configuring the array of light emitters to occupy a portion of a field of view of the camera; adapting a modulation pattern of light emitted by the array; and determining, from the image-processing outputs and/or navigation signals, if the modulation pattern affects at least one of image processing or navigation control performed in the navigation system.