Adaptive Particle Sorting via Machine Learning Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing particle analyzers face challenges in efficiently and accurately sorting particles in high-dimensional data spaces, particularly due to difficulties in visualizing and defining gates, hindsight bias in user selection, and the inability to distinguish events using traditional graphical representations.

Innovation Solution

A two-phase classification process involving user-defined target populations and machine learning techniques to optimize sorting strategies, including neural networks for feature extraction and transformation of data, ensuring accurate and efficient sorting configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional graphical representations and manual gating methods are used for particle sorting, then users can visualize and define particle populations, but the process becomes inefficient and inaccurate in high-dimensional data spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoiddata dimensionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual graphical gating methods with automated machine learning classification. Neural networks and supervised learning algorithms automatically identify particle populations in high-dimensional space without requiring users to manually draw gates on 2D projections, thereby maintaining sorting accuracy while handling complex data dimensions efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing layers including feature extraction, dimensionality reduction techniques, and automated gate generation algorithms. These intermediaries transform raw high-dimensional data into manageable representations that can be accurately classified, bridging the gap between complex data and sorting decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If users manually define sorting gates in high-dimensional space, then they can control particle classification, but hindsight bias and difficulty in visualizing gates reduce reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting reliabilityVSAvoidgate definition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating sorting gates and classification rules through machine learning algorithms. The neural networks autonomously identify optimal separation boundaries in high-dimensional space based on training data, eliminating the need for users to manually define gates and thereby improving reliability while simplifying operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system evaluates sorting performance and iteratively refines classification boundaries. Supervised learning algorithms use labeled training data to learn optimal gate definitions, and the system can validate results by comparing predicted classifications against known particle populations, thereby enhancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional sorting methods are used, then the system structure remains simple, but the ability to distinguish and sort events in high-dimensional space is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent discrimination capabilityVSAvoidsorting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the sorting approach by changing from fixed threshold-based parameters to dynamic, data-driven classification parameters. Neural networks learn optimal parameter combinations and weightings from training data, enabling the system to adapt to different particle types and sorting requirements while handling high-dimensional data effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal sorting platform that can handle multiple particle types and sorting criteria through a single machine learning framework. The same neural network infrastructure can be trained on different datasets and applied to various sorting tasks, providing versatile event discrimination capability without requiring separate systems for each application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250208024A1Adaptive Sorting for Particle Analyzers
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • US20250208024A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208024A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208024A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cell sorting system that automatically generates a sorting strategy based on examples of target events provided by an operator. The target events can be selected using measurements ranging from traditional flow cytometry measurements to derived measurements that are computationally expensive to complex measurements such as images.