Adaptive PFAS Effluent Treatment for Short- and Long-Chain Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing treatments for removing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from liquid effluents are costly and inefficient for compounds with varying carbon chain lengths and hydrophobicity, particularly short-chain PFAS, which are difficult to remove using conventional methods like adsorption on activated carbon or ion exchange resins.

Innovation Solution

A control system with a PFAS treatment unit that includes dedicated stages for short and long chain PFAS, activated only when necessary, using specific reagents and processes like nanofiltration and reverse osmosis to achieve efficient removal, reducing maintenance and operational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional treatment methods like adsorption on activated carbon or ion exchange resins are used, then long-chain PFAS can be removed, but short-chain PFAS remain difficult to remove

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal efficiencyVSAvoideffectiveness across different PFAS types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment system is divided into multiple specialized stages: a first treatment stage using activated carbon for long-chain PFAS removal, and a second treatment stage using nanofiltration or reverse osmosis for short-chain PFAS removal. Each stage is optimized for specific PFAS types, allowing the system to effectively handle the full spectrum of PFAS compounds rather than relying on a single method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If nanofiltration or reverse osmosis is used, then all PFAS compounds can be removed, but treatment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal efficiencyVSAvoidtreatment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the treatment process into two stages with different technologies. The first stage uses cost-effective activated carbon adsorption for long-chain PFAS, and only activates the more expensive nanofiltration or reverse osmosis stage when short-chain PFAS are detected, optimizing cost-efficiency while maintaining high removal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically activates or deactivates treatment stages based on real-time detection of PFAS presence and type. The control unit monitors effluent characteristics and adjusts which treatment stages operate, allowing the system to adapt to varying contamination levels and reduce operational costs when full treatment is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If treatment stages are continuously activated, then PFAS removal is ensured, but maintenance and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal assuranceVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit dynamically manages treatment stage activation based on real-time monitoring of PFAS presence in the effluent. Treatment stages are activated only when PFAS are detected and deactivated when not needed, ensuring reliable removal when required while minimizing operational and maintenance costs during normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously monitors effluent characteristics and uses this information to adjust treatment stage operation. This feedback loop ensures that treatment is applied only when necessary, optimizing the balance between removal assurance and cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a single treatment method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but effectiveness varies with PFAS carbon chain length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment system structureVSAvoideffectiveness across PFAS types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment system is segmented into multiple specialized stages, each optimized for specific PFAS types. The first stage handles long-chain PFAS with activated carbon, while the second stage handles short-chain PFAS with nanofiltration or reverse osmosis, creating a modular structure that improves versatility without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment system is designed to perform multiple functions through different stages that can handle various PFAS types. The control unit coordinates these stages to provide universal PFAS removal capability, making the system adaptable to different contamination scenarios while maintaining a manageable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces PFAS concentrations in liquid effluents to meet regulatory standards, adapting treatment based on PFAS presence, ensuring high removal efficiency and cost-effectiveness by activating treatment stages only when needed.

Implementation Method 1

using specific reagents and processes like nanofiltration and reverse osmosis to achieve efficient removal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNanofiltration:

Implementation Method 2

using specific reagents and processes like nanofiltration and reverse osmosis to achieve efficient removal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse osmosis: Reverse Osmosis

Implementation Method 3

conventional methods like adsorption on activated carbon or ion exchange resins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

conventional methods like adsorption on activated carbon or ion exchange resins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Data Source

PatentEP4185555B1PFAS treatment process for liquid effluent
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 SUEZ INTERNATIONAL
  • EP4185555B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4185555B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4185555B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for controlling for PFAS removal from a liquid effluent by means of a control System (100), said control System including a PFAS treatment unit (10) dedicated to the treatment of perfluoroalkyls and polyfluoroalkyl substances PFAS including at least one treatment stage optionally chosen from a PFAS treatment stage, a short chain PFAS treatment stage and a long chain PFAS treatment stage. The method allows activating the PFAS treatment unit only when PFAS, in particular spécifie PFAS, are detected into the liquid effluent to treat. The invention also relates to a control System (100) to implement the method of the invention.