Adaptive Processor Pipeline Bypass for Hazard Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pipelining in processing systems increases instruction execution rate but also introduces significant latency due to hazards like data dependencies and control flow changes, leading to pipeline stalls that degrade system performance.

Innovation Solution

A processor with adaptive pipeline control logic that selectively configures the pipeline length based on the type of instruction being executed, using reduced length for instructions that cause hazards and full length for others, and incorporates latency reduction logic to execute certain instructions in fewer stages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pipelining is used to increase instruction execution rate, then productivity is improved, but loss of time increases due to pipeline latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction execution rateVSAvoidpipeline latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pipeline configuration is made dynamic and adaptive rather than static. The pipeline control logic dynamically adjusts the number of pipeline stages based on the type of instruction being executed. Different instruction types (e.g., arithmetic, logical, memory access, branch instructions) are routed through different numbers of pipeline stages, allowing the system to optimize between throughput and latency on a per-instruction basis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of pipeline depth dynamically. Instead of using a fixed number of pipeline stages for all instructions, the system varies the effective pipeline depth parameter based on instruction characteristics. Simple instructions use fewer stages to reduce latency, while complex instructions utilize the full pipeline depth to maintain throughput capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If pipeline stages are increased to handle more instruction types, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction type handlingVSAvoidpipeline structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipeline is segmented into multiple functional stages, each capable of handling specific instruction types. The pipeline control logic segments the instruction stream and routes different instruction types through appropriate numbers of stages. This segmentation allows the system to handle diverse instruction types while maintaining a manageable structure where each stage has a defined, simplified function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pipeline stages are designed with multi-functionality to handle various instruction types. Rather than having dedicated hardware for each instruction type, the same pipeline infrastructure is universally applied to different instructions by dynamically configuring which stages are active. This universal approach reduces overall device complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260017061A1Processor having adaptive pipeline with latency reduction logic that selectively executes instructions to reduce latency
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20260017061A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017061A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for reducing pipeline latency. In one embodiment, a processing system includes a processing pipeline. The processing pipeline includes a plurality of processing stages. Each stage is configured to further processing provided by a previous stage. A first of the stages is configured to perform a first function in a pipeline cycle. A second of the stages is disposed downstream of the first of the stages, and is configured to perform, in a pipeline cycle, a second function that is different from the first function. The first of the stages is further configured to selectably perform the first function and the second function in a pipeline cycle, and bypass the second of the stages.