Adaptive Planting Row Unit Depth Control via Forward Residue Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural equipment lacks efficient automatic control systems for row crop implements, particularly in managing soil conditions and adjusting hydraulic pressures on-the-go.

Innovation Solution

The development of an agricultural implement with a towing frame hitched to a tractor, featuring a row unit with soil-engaging tools, hydraulic cylinders, and a control system that includes sensors and controllable pressure control valves. This system allows for real-time adjustment of hydraulic pressures based on soil hardness conditions detected by sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of hydraulic pressure is used, then the system is simple, but the planting depth control precision deteriorates under varying soil conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting depth control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect soil conditions and provides feedback to the controller, which automatically adjusts hydraulic pressure to maintain optimal planting depth. This closed-loop feedback mechanism resolves the contradiction by achieving precise depth control through automated sensing and adjustment, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining system effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors, controllers, and hydraulic actuators. This substitution transforms the control mechanism from purely mechanical to electro-hydraulic, enabling precise depth control while reducing operational complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed hydraulic pressure is applied, then the system is simple to operate, but the adaptability to varying soil hardness conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to soil conditionsVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed hydraulic pressure to dynamic, variable pressure control based on real-time soil condition sensing. The controller continuously adjusts hydraulic pressure in response to sensor feedback about soil hardness, enabling the system to adapt to varying field conditions automatically without requiring operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of hydraulic pressure based on sensor detection of soil conditions. The automated control system monitors and regulates pressure without human input, allowing the implement to service itself by adapting to terrain variations, thereby maintaining ease of operation while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If uniform down pressure is applied across all row units, then the hydraulic system is simple, but the productivity under varying soil conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting efficiencyVSAvoidhydraulic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic system is segmented into independent control zones for different row units or sections of the implement. Each segment can receive independently controlled hydraulic pressure based on local soil conditions detected by dedicated sensors, allowing optimized planting performance across varying field conditions without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different hydraulic pressure levels to different sections of the implement based on local soil conditions rather than using uniform pressure throughout. This localized control approach enables each row unit to operate optimally for its specific terrain conditions, maximizing overall productivity while managing complexity through modular section control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250160235A1System and method for adaptively controlling depth of ground-engaging planting row unit using forward sensor that measures residue ahead of row unit
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 DEERE & CO
  • US20250160235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250160235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250160235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural implement includes at least one row unit having a plurality of support members, each of which is pivotably coupled to an attachment frame or another of the support members to permit vertical pivoting vertical movement of the support members, and a plurality of soil-engaging tools, each of which is coupled to at least one of the support members. A plurality of hydraulic cylinders are coupled to the support members for urging the support members downwardly toward the soil. A plurality of controllable pressure control valves are coupled to the hydraulic cylinders for controlling the pressure of hydraulic fluid supplied to the cylinders. A plurality of sensors produce electrical signals corresponding to predetermined conditions, and a controller is coupled to the sensor and the controllable pressure control valves. The controller receives the electrical signals from the sensors and produces control signals for controlling the pressure control valves.