Adaptive Positioning Method Selection in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current positioning methods in wireless networks are inefficient in dynamic environments, as they rely on fixed techniques and do not adapt to changing conditions, leading to varying accuracy and availability of location information.

Innovation Solution

A method where a location server in a wireless network adaptively selects positioning techniques for a user equipment (UE) based on parameter information, allowing the UE to dynamically choose the most suitable positioning method for accurate location determination, minimizing excessive signaling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fixed positioning methods are used in current wireless networks, then the positioning system is simple to implement, but the location information accuracy deteriorates in dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation information accuracyVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic positioning method selection where the UE adapts between different positioning techniques (GNSS, Wi-Fi, cellular) based on real-time environmental conditions and service requirements, transforming the static positioning system into a dynamic one that optimizes accuracy for varying scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes positioning parameters dynamically by selecting different positioning methods based on environmental parameters (indoor/outdoor, urban/rural) and service parameters (accuracy requirements, latency constraints), allowing the same system to achieve high accuracy across diverse conditions without increasing fundamental system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple positioning methods are always used to ensure accuracy, then location information availability improves, but energy consumption in the UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation information availabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption in UE
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The UE dynamically activates or deactivates specific positioning methods based on current environmental conditions and service requirements, ensuring high availability when needed while conserving energy during periods when certain methods are unnecessary or unavailable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The UE autonomously performs adaptive selection of positioning methods based on local environmental assessments and received service requirements, making real-time decisions about which positioning techniques to employ without requiring continuous network control, thereby optimizing energy usage while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the network controls all positioning decisions centrally, then positioning performance can be optimized, but signaling overhead between UE and network increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning performanceVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The network provides positioning policy parameters and service requirement information as intermediary guidance to the UE, which then autonomously selects appropriate positioning methods based on these parameters, reducing the need for extensive direct network control signaling while maintaining optimized positioning performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The UE autonomously performs positioning method selection based on received policy parameters and local environmental conditions, eliminating the need for the network to send detailed control signals for each positioning decision, thereby reducing signaling overhead while maintaining centralized optimization capabilities through policy guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If adaptive positioning method selection is implemented, then location information accuracy improves in dynamic environments, but the complexity of the positioning system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation information accuracyVSAvoidUE positioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UE implements dynamic selection among a finite set of positioning methods based on environmental conditions and service requirements, achieving high accuracy through adaptability while managing complexity by using standardized protocols and predefined positioning techniques rather than requiring complex custom algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240151859A1Method for adaptive location information obtainment in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US20240151859A1 patent drawing
  • US20240151859A1 patent drawing
  • US20240151859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method carried out in a user equipment, UE, (1) for generating location information to a location server (130) in a wireless network (100), the method comprising: receiving (404), from the location server, a location request message identifying a request for location information based on adaptive selection of a positioning method; receiving (404,408), from the wireless network, parameter information for the adaptive selection of the positioning method; obtaining (412) location information using the positioning method adaptively selected by the UE based on the parameter information; transmitting (414) the location information to the location server.