Adaptive Transmission Power Allocation for TV White Space Secondary Services
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Secondary usage of TV white spaces faces limitations due to interference with primary systems, as existing methods often reduce transmission power, leading to decreased capacity and communication quality for secondary services, especially in areas with unsuitable signal receiving conditions.
Innovation Solution
A method for adaptive transmission power allocation in secondary communication services, determining acceptable interference power and selecting distribution rules based on interference levels and capacity calculations to minimize interference with primary systems while maximizing secondary service capacity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Object-affected harmful factors
If transmission power is reduced to avoid interference with primary systems, then interference on primary systems is decreased, but capacity and communication quality for secondary services deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic transmission power allocation by introducing multiple distribution rules (equal distribution, proportional distribution based on acceptable interference power, and proportional distribution based on path loss) that can be adaptively selected. The system dynamically adjusts power allocation strategies based on real-time channel conditions, node locations, and interference requirements, transforming the static power control into a dynamic optimization process that resolves the contradiction between interference reduction and capacity maintenance.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter of transmission power allocation by introducing different distribution rules that modify how power is allocated among secondary users. By varying the allocation parameters (equal shares, proportional to acceptable interference, proportional to path loss), the system can optimize the balance between minimizing interference to primary systems and maintaining adequate capacity for secondary services under different operating conditions.
2Productivity
If transmission power is increased to improve capacity for secondary services, then capacity and communication quality for secondary services are improved, but interference on primary systems increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs parameter changes by implementing multiple power distribution rules that adjust the allocation parameters based on system conditions. The proportional distribution rule based on acceptable interference power allows secondary users closer to primary systems to transmit at lower powers while users farther away can utilize higher powers, thereby improving overall secondary service capacity while respecting interference constraints through parameterized allocation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by differentiating power allocation based on the specific location and channel conditions of each secondary user relative to primary systems. Users experiencing different path losses and interference environments receive customized power allocations, allowing those in favorable conditions to transmit at higher powers for improved capacity while those near primary systems transmit at lower powers to minimize interference.
3Ease of operation
If equal distribution of transmission power is used among secondary services, then simplicity of power allocation is maintained, but optimization of capacity based on channel conditions is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transforms the static equal distribution approach into a dynamic multi-rule system. The coordinator can select among equal distribution, proportional distribution based on acceptable interference power, and proportional distribution based on path loss depending on real-time conditions. This dynamic selection mechanism maintains operational simplicity through automated rule selection while achieving capacity optimization by adapting to channel conditions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the power allocation problem into multiple distribution rules that can be independently evaluated and selected. By dividing the allocation strategy into distinct rules (equal, proportional to interference acceptance, proportional to path loss), the system maintains the simplicity of equal distribution when appropriate while enabling optimized distribution when channel conditions warrant it, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and optimization.
4Reliability
If adaptive transmission power control is implemented to protect primary system nodes, then interference protection is improved, but complexity of power allocation increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a coordinator as an intermediary that centralizes the complex power allocation calculations and rule selection. The coordinator receives information from secondary users, determines appropriate distribution rules, and allocates powers accordingly. This intermediary approach improves protection of primary system nodes through centralized adaptive control while managing complexity by consolidating decision-making logic in a single entity rather than distributing it across all secondary users.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the complex adaptive power control function into distinct modular rules (equal distribution, proportional to acceptable interference power, proportional to path loss). Each rule represents a self-contained algorithm that can be independently evaluated and selected. This segmentation reduces overall complexity by breaking down the adaptive control problem into manageable, pre-defined strategies that the coordinator can select based on current conditions.
Data Source
AI summary
There is provided a method for allocating a transmission power to a second communication service making secondary usage of a spectrum assigned to a first communication service, in a node which is able to communicate with a secondary usage node, comprising the steps of: determining an interference power acceptable for two or more second communication services when the two or more second communication services are operated; distributing a transmission power depending on the interference power among the two or more second communication services according to a first rule; distributing the transmission power similarly according to a second rule; selecting one of the first rule and the second rule based on transmission powers distributed according to the first rule and transmission powers distributed according to the second rule; and allocating the transmission powers distributed according to the selected rule respectively to the two or more second communication services.


