Adaptive Power Control for Electronic Devices Based on Operational Load

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric power control methods for electronic devices, such as portable computers, do not effectively manage power consumption based on the device's operational load, leading to unnecessary minimization of CPU performance.

Innovation Solution

An electric power control device and method that monitor power consumption, calculate moving averages, determine operational loads, and switch between restriction and restriction release modes to optimize power usage by imposing or releasing upper limits on source power or CPU frequency based on load zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If power consumption is minimized based on battery information and supplied power, then power consumption is reduced, but CPU performance is not demonstrated adequately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidCPU performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the power control system adaptive and responsive to real-time CPU load conditions. The control section dynamically switches between restriction mode and restriction release mode based on monitored power consumption and calculated moving averages, allowing the system to optimize between power savings and performance based on actual operational needs rather than static battery information alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring power consumption, calculating moving averages, and using this information to determine CPU load states. The control section uses this feedback loop to adjust power restriction levels, ensuring that power consumption is minimized only when appropriate while maintaining CPU performance when needed based on actual load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If upper limit of source power or CPU frequency is imposed based on battery information, then power consumption is reduced, but CPU performance is unnecessarily restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidCPU operational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts power restriction levels based on real-time CPU load monitoring. The control section switches between restriction mode and restriction release mode according to the determined load state, allowing the CPU to operate with full flexibility when load requires it while imposing restrictions only when power conservation is appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of power restriction level based on CPU load state. By calculating moving averages of power consumption and comparing them against thresholds, the system adjusts the upper limit of source power or CPU frequency to match actual operational requirements, avoiding unnecessary restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If moving average calculation and load state determination are implemented, then optimal power control according to actual load is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control optimizationVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by implementing automated monitoring and control mechanisms that operate independently. The control section automatically monitors power consumption, calculates moving averages, determines load states, and adjusts power restriction levels without requiring manual intervention, thereby achieving optimal power control while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or manual power control mechanisms with electronic monitoring and software-based control. By using a control section that processes electrical signals and executes control logic, the system achieves sophisticated power optimization without the complexity of mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8788851B2Electric device power control optimized to device operational load state
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US8788851B2 patent drawing
  • US8788851B2 patent drawing
  • US8788851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric power control device includes: a power consumption monitoring section for monitoring electric power consumed by an electronic device; a moving average calculation section for calculating a moving average of the power consumption of the electronic device, based on the power consumption monitored by the power consumption monitoring section; a state-of-load determination section for determining state of the operational load on the electronic device, based on the moving average calculated by the moving average calculation section; and a control section configured to control the electronic device to operate either in a restriction mode in which an upper limit corresponding to state of load determined by the state-of-load determination section is imposed, or in a restriction release mode in which the upper limit is not imposed.