Adaptive Power Device Interface Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power device configurations, such as UPS systems, lack user-friendly and adaptive interfaces for initial setup and ongoing configuration, making it difficult for users to optimize operational parameters for power quality, battery runtime, and lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for configuring a power device using an alphanumeric user interface that prompts users to input power quality and preference settings, determining and applying operational parameter values, and adapting the interface structure based on user input and detected peripherals, allowing for initial setup and ongoing adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a power device uses a fixed, non-adaptive user interface for configuration, then the device structure remains simple, but the ease of operation deteriorates because users cannot optimize settings for their specific environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of configurationVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface dynamically adapts its structure and content based on detected environmental conditions (power quality, connected peripherals) and user input preferences. The interface transitions from a static fixed structure to a dynamic one that reconfigures itself during initial power-up and operation, allowing users to optimize settings for their specific environment while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the power device applies default operational parameters without user input, then the ease of operation improves, but the reliability deteriorates because the parameters may not be optimized for the specific power environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidconfiguration effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of power quality and connected peripherals during initial power-up, and automatically applies optimized operational parameters based on this detected environment. This preliminary configuration action ensures reliability by tailoring settings to the specific environment before the user begins normal operation, while still allowing users to review and modify settings if desired.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The power device automatically detects its operating environment (power quality, connected peripherals) and configures its own operational parameters without requiring extensive user input. The system serves itself by gathering environmental data and applying appropriate settings, reducing configuration effort while ensuring optimized and reliable operation for the specific environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the user interface adapts to user expertise level and environmental conditions, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases due to adaptive interface structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface usabilityVSAvoidinterface adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface applies different levels of complexity and detail to different users based on their expertise level. Novice users receive a simplified interface with essential options and guidance, while expert users access advanced configuration options. This local quality approach tailors the interface complexity to the specific user's needs, improving usability without requiring the system to maintain high complexity for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If the power device collects extensive user input during initial setup, then the operational parameters can be optimized, but the loss of time increases due to prolonged configuration process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimizationVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements optional configuration steps where users can provide input for critical parameters that significantly impact operation (such as power quality and connected peripherals) while skipping less critical options. The interface allows users to provide just enough information to achieve adequate optimization without requiring extensive input, balancing parameter optimization with configuration time by making advanced optimization optional rather than mandatory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8732602B2System and method for altering a user interface of a power device
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT CORP
  • US8732602B2 patent drawing
  • US8732602B2 patent drawing
  • US8732602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for altering a user interface of a power device is provided. The user interface includes an interface structure. The method includes acts of receiving user preference information, determining additional configuration information of the power device, adapting the interface structure based at least in part on the user preference information and the additional configuration information and providing at least a portion of the adapted interface structure to a user via the user interface.