Adaptive Privacy Budgeting for Accurate Noisy Value Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for tracking user interactions and estimating counts lack differential privacy, potentially revealing sensitive user information, and struggle to provide accurate estimates within a target accuracy threshold.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of multiple noisy datasets by adding random noise to ground truth values, processing these datasets to determine a predicted value, and stopping when the standard deviation meets a threshold, ensuring differential privacy and target accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noisy datasets are generated by adding random noise to ground truth values to maintain differential privacy, then user privacy is protected, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential privacyVSAvoidvalue estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the estimation process into multiple independent rounds, each generating noisy estimates with differential privacy. By dividing the overall estimation task into multiple stages with progressively refined noise levels, the system achieves both privacy protection and improved accuracy through aggregated results across rounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of noise parameters and sampling rates across different rounds of estimation. The noise standard deviation and sampling rate are adjusted based on previous round results, allowing the system to optimize the balance between privacy protection and measurement precision adaptively rather than using fixed parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple rounds of noisy value generation are performed to improve estimation accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases due to iterative processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimated value accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where each round's noisy estimates and standard deviations are used to inform subsequent rounds. The system monitors the reduction in standard deviation across rounds and uses this feedback to determine when to terminate, preventing unnecessary additional rounds and optimizing the time-accuracy tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs a predetermined number of rounds that is sufficient to achieve the target accuracy threshold but not excessively more. By carefully selecting the number of rounds based on expected convergence behavior, the system avoids both insufficient processing and wasteful over-processing, achieving optimal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the noise range is increased to enhance privacy protection, then differential privacy is strengthened, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to larger estimation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection levelVSAvoidcount estimation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the noise range (standard deviation) across different rounds of estimation. Early rounds use larger noise ranges for stronger privacy protection, while subsequent rounds use progressively smaller noise ranges to refine accuracy. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to achieve both strong privacy protection and high estimation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the privacy-precision tradeoff across multiple rounds, with each round serving a different purpose in the overall estimation process. By dividing the task into stages with differentiated noise levels, the system achieves cumulative accuracy improvement while maintaining strong privacy protection through the aggregation of multiple noisy observations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If adaptive sampling with varying sampling rates is used to improve efficiency, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases due to additional control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation efficiencyVSAvoidsampling control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adaptive sampling where the sampling rate dynamically changes across rounds based on the estimated variance and target accuracy requirements. Later rounds use higher sampling rates to refine estimates with smaller noise, while earlier rounds use lower sampling rates. This dynamic adaptation improves efficiency without requiring complex per-sample decision mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sampling rate parameter across different rounds of estimation based on performance requirements and observed variance. By adjusting this single parameter systematically, the system achieves improved productivity without introducing complex control logic, maintaining relative simplicity while adapting to accuracy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260073064A1Adaptive Privacy Budgeting and Adaptive Sampling Value Prediction
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260073064A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073064A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073064A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating and maintaining differential privacy while providing accurate values can include obtaining a plurality of noise-added values, processing the plurality of noise-added values to determine a predicted value. The plurality of noise-added value may be utilized to determine one or more accuracy values that can be compared to a threshold to determine if more data is to be obtained and processed before providing a predicted value.